Amos 3

 

 

Chapters 3-6 relate three addresses particularizing the sins of Israel and announces

their imminent judgment.

 

 

Chapter 3 gives the first address:  the prophet begins by showing Israels

ingratitude for past mercies (vs. 1-2), and his own commission to announce the

coming judgment (vs. 3-8). They have drawn this upon themselves by iniquities

which astonish even heathen nations; and they shall be punished by the overthrow

of the kingdom and the destruction of their city (vs. 9-15).

 

 

1  “Hear this word that the LORD hath spoken against you, O children of

Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt,

saying,”  - The peculiar favor which God has shown the Israelites enhances the

guilt of their ingratitude and increases their punishment. Hear this word. Each address

(ch 4:1; 5:1) begins with this solemn call.  O children of Israel. The summons is

addressed to the twelve tribes, as the following words prove; but the succeeding

denunciation is confined to Israel, Judah being only indirectly warned that she may

expect a similar fate unless she turns in time. I brought up from the land of Egypt.

This is mentioned as the crowning act of God’s favor (ch. 2:10).

 

2 “You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I

will punish you for all your iniquities.”  Have I known; i.e. loved, acknowledged,

chosen. So in Hosea 13:5 God says. “I knew thee in the wilderness;” and Paul

(II Timothy 2:19), “The Lord knoweth them that are His” (compare Nahum 1:7).

The peculiar relation in which God allowed Israel to stand to Him is much dwelt

upon (see Deuteronomy 4:8,20; 14:2; II Samuel 7:23; I Chronicles 17:21).

Therefore I will punish you;  literally, visit upon you. They must not presume

upon their privileges; the retention of God’s favor depended upon obedience to

His Word (Exodus 19:5): the nearer they were brought to God, the greater their

guilt if they fell from Him. Unlike the nations denounced in the former chapters,

Israel had sinned against light and knowledge and love, therefore the sentence on

her must be heavier (compare Ezekiel 9:6; Luke 12:47; I Peter 4:17).

 

 

The Judgment of Apostates a Foregone Conclusion (vs. 1-2)

 

This chapter, like chapters 5 and 6, opens with a call to attention. God is going

to speak, and His voice is worth listening to. He is going to speak a word,

moreover, the issues of which are capital offenses. To attend to His communication

is as vitally important as dutiful.

 

  • GOD, WHO HAD ONLY SPOKEN ABOUT THE HEATHEN, NOW

SPEAKS TO ISRAEL. Syria and Edom and Tyre may never have heard

of the doom to which they were going down. Their first intimation of the

tempest of Divine wrath was likely the falling of the first drops. Their

chance of repentance and escape was in this way minimized. Left in

ignorance of the danger of advance, there was little likelihood of their

turning back of their own accord. But Israel hears from inspired lips that

never lied the guilt of her sin, and its inevitable end. This putting of

“prophecy between his secret and its execution” is a special favor on

God’s side (v.7), and a corresponding advantage on her side, whilst, like

all advantage, it involves a proportionate responsibility.

 

  • GOD’S SPECIAL REGARD FOR ISRAEL HAD EXPRESSED

ITSELF IN PECULIAR FAVORS.

 

Ø      He had constituted them a family by themselves. Other nations

in their rise had been left to circumstances and the play of natural

affinities. Israel had been called out of the peoples, constituted a

nation by itself, furnished with a national organization and policy,

and set consciously to work out an exalted destiny. This was fitted

to awake a lofty national aspiration, and give direction and dignity

to the national life. The choosing of God’s people out of the world

is the beginning of His favors.

 

Ø      He had brought them out of Egypt. This was an act of Divine

power, an instance of Divine championship, an expression of Divine

distinguishing favor, and a beginning of Divine help, which

contained in it the promise of more to come. Conversion, following

on election (Acts 13:48), is another privilege of God’s people, and

another spur to grateful service.

 

Ø      He had taken them into intimate personal relations. Known.

This is practically equivalent to electing, including both the

motive and result of election. God took special notice of them,

set them in a gracious relation to Himself, acknowledged them

to be His people, and brought to Bear on them the influences that

are ever coming forth on those in covenant with him.

 

  • JUDGMENT IS INEVITABLE WHERE MERCY HAS BEEN

RECEIVED IN VAIN. “Therefore will I visit,” - (v. 2). Mercy

extended is made here the ground of judgment denounced. Each gift

bestowed in the past is a count in the present indictment.

 

Ø      It is inevitable as punishment. Sin by God’s professing people is

specially heinous. It involves ingratitude to a special Benefactor,

insensibility to His love, contempt of His gifts, and disregard of

special claims on their allegiance. The guilt is in every aspect

extreme, and so the punishment is sure.

 

Ø      It is inevitable as testimony. God’s honor is closely identified with

His people’s conduct, which must therefore be closely looked after.

Any sin in it must be rigidly punished if God would vindicate His

purity and impartiality, hating sin as such, and wherever it appears.

“It is necessary that God should vindicate His own honor by making

it appear that He hates sin, and hates it most in those that are nearest

Him” (Matthew Henry).

 

Ø      It is inevitable as discipline. Judgments are corrective as well as

punative, In this aspect they are sure, and will be severe in proportion

to the love and mercy despised. Whom God leaves without correction

He bastardizes (Hebrews 12:8), but He expresses fatherly interest in

the application of the rod. Judgment with Israel was just a change of

corrective treatment. Mercy had failed, and now love would try

another way, that nothing might be left undone to separate Israel

from sin. This is why judgment begins at the house of God.

(I Peter 4:17)

 

 

 

                        The Inevitable Punishment of Christian Sin (v. 2)

 

“You only have I known of all the families of the earth, therefore I will

punish you for all your iniquities.” These words are at once an accusation,

a condemnation, and a sentence. What God had done for Israel in vain was

a ground and the measure of what He now must do against them. Blessing

abused is but the faggot feeding the fire of merited curse. They had given

themselves up to wickedness, and the fire tongue of a lofty privilege sits

above every sin, revealing its demon face.

 

·         THERE IS A GRACIOUS SENSE IN WHICH GOD KNOWS MEN.

“I know my sheep” (John 10:27); “I never knew you.” (Matthew 7:23)

These sentences mean salvation and condemnation respectively. For God to

know men is with them a question of life and death. This knowledge may be:

 

Ø      National. It was so with Israel. “You only have I known.” This meant

that God loved them (Deuteronomy 10:15), chose them (ibid. 7:6),

formally acknowledged them as his people (ibid.  14:2), and gave

them privileges — not necessarily saving in every case - of light

(Psalm 147:19; Romans 3:2), and help (Psalm 136:10-24), and

fellowship (Exodus 20:24; Numbers 14:14; Deuteronomy 4:7),

and promise (Romans 9:4-5), answering to this visible relation.

This knowledge may also be:

 

Ø      Personal. Then it means, in addition to what has been mentioned, the

forth-putting of Divine energy in them, making them new creatures

m Christ, and so “partakers of the Divine nature” (Galatians 6:15;

II  Peter 1:4). God brings them into His family (Galatians 3:26) by this

spiritual birth (John 1:13), calls them sons (1 John 3:1), makes them

coheirs with Christ (Romans 8:17), and gives them all family privileges

and graces, chiefest of these the spirit of adoption, by which we cry,

“Abba, Father” (Galatians 4:6). Man, in fact, is by nature an alien

and a stranger, and for God to know him is to substitute a gracious

for his natural relation.

 

·         THIS KNOWLEDGE IS A SPECIAL, NOT A GENERAL,

AFFECTION. “You only.” There are gifts of God that are indiscriminate

(Job 25:3; Matthew 5:45). Man gets them as man, and irrespective

of personal character. But spiritual gifts are necessarily confined to the

spiritual circle. It is evident as regards God’s gracious knowledge of men.

 

Ø      That it rests on a minority of the race. Israel at best was little among the

nations of the earth. In comparison with the Chaldeae, Medo-Persian,

Greek, or Roman empires, it was scarcely worthy of being named; and a

dozen peoples bordered Palestine from time to time, any one of which, in

the natural course, would have wiped it off the earth. Yet, passing by the

many and the mighty, God says to single, feeble Israel, “You only have I

known of all the families of the earth” (Deuteronomy 4:32-38). And

this action is of a piece with other Divine action for similar purposes. The

saints are now, and have always been, a “little flock.” It is the few who

go in at the “strait gate” of the kingdom. Even the nominally Christian

people sare less than a third of the population of the earth. If out of the

number of these were taken the actual Christians, the true believers in

Christ, the saintly company would assume smaller dimensions still. This

state of matters will no doubt be reversed before the dispensation ends.

Christ “in all things shall have the pre-eminence,” (Colossians 1:18)

and the minority which His followers compose will, during the

millennial era, be converted into a vast majority (Isaiah 11:9).

Meantime God looks on a small circle of transfigured souls, and says,

“You only have I known.”

 

Ø      It does not follow human probabilities. If any single nation was to be

made the repository of revealed truth, and the teacher of the other nations,

we should have expected one or other of the four universal empires to be

chosen for the purpose, rather than a second or third rate power, located

in a circumscribed and excentric spot. Then the typical Jew was, like

his ancestor Jacob, a sordid fellow, deficient in the more heroic qualities,

and, from the standpoint of the natural, decidedly inferior to his brother

the Edomite, or almost any neighbor you would select. The greater

readiness with which the Gentiles received the gospel, when it came

to them, would seem, moreover, to indicate that they would have

responded more worthily to the Divine Old Testament culture than

Israel did, if it had pleased God to bring it to bear. It is the same with

individuals. Not only does God pass by the rich and great for the

humble poor (James 2:5; 1 Corinthians 1:26-28), but He passes by

the wise and prudent, and gives the light of His salvation to babes

(Matthew 11:25). It is not the great geniuses of society, but the

commonplace average men, who form the circle of the saints.

The reasons for this are adequate, but God keeps them to himself.

Obvious to reason in many cases, they are not revealed, because in

many others they would be above it, and God acts without reasons

given, that “no flesh may glory in His presence.”  (I Corinthians 1:29)

 

·         IT DOES NOT INEVITABLY PREVENT SIN IN THE OBJECT

OF IT. The life of the Hebrews was as a whole above the moral level of the

heathen life around them. But still it was far from pure. If we subtracted

from Jewish history all that arises out of sin, and the punishment of it,

comparatively little would remain. So little congenial to human nature is

God’s service, and so congenial the service of sin, that Israel was

perpetually turning aside after the idols of the heathen, whilst in no instance

did the heathen ever turn from their idols to God (Jeremiah 2:11). And

not only does outward religious privilege fail to put an end to the sinful

life, it is to some extent the same with inward religious principle. The saint

remains a sinner all his days. Grace, like the house of David, is getting

stronger with him, and corruption, like the house of Saul, is getting weaker

through life. But it is still with him as with the apostle, striving after

perfection, yet burdened with a feeling of the surviving power of sin

(Philippians 3:12; Romans 7:24).

 

·         IT DOES MAKE THE PUNISHMENT OF SIN ON EARTH

CERTAIN. “Therefore will I punish you.” Sin inside the kingdom

necessitates punishment, and will be visited with it promptly.

 

Ø      Because it is guiltiest as against God. More has been done to prevent it

than in other cases. It is sin against light (James 4:17; Luke 12:47-48),

against love (II Corinthians 5:14), against favors (Psalm 103:2), against

restraining grace (1 John 3:9). In proportion to the strength and number

of deterrent influences against which sin is committed must be the

strength of our sinful bent, and so the guilt of our wrong doing.

 

Ø      Because it is most hurtful as against His cause. The sin of the wicked is

natural. It is to be expected from one who consults lust and serves the

devil. It is done, moreover, from the standpoint of opposition to God,

and responsibility for it is thus kept outside the spiritual circle. God

and His cause are not dishonored in the eyes of men by what is formally

done against them. It is sin by the professedly righteous that brings

righteousness into disrepute. Religion is charged with all the evil that is

done in its name.  The more closely identified wrong doing is with the

Christian name, the more hurtful is it to the Christian cause. Therefore

Christian sin, in addition to the general reasons, involves punishment

for reasons peculiar to itself. If God would have His Church a tree for

the healing of the nations, He must lop off every unsound and rotten

branch.

 

Ø      Because it is most incompatible with the destiny of the person sinning.

The sin of the wicked need not necessarily be punished here. It will be

amply visited on him throughout eternity. It is quite in the line of the

man’s life course that he should suffer the vengeance of eternal fire.

But the sin of the righteous presents a different aspect. Its commission

is the contradiction of his gracious nature, and its future punishment

would be the contradiction of his exalted destiny. It is vital to his well

being that the judgment, inevitable somewhere, should fall here

(Psalm 89:30-33). Only thus can his happy immortality be safeguarded.

The present destruction of his flesh conditions the saving of his spirit

in the day of the Lord Jesus (1 Corinthians 5:5).

 

 

 

                                    Sin against Light and Love (vs. 1-2)

 

This language of reproach and threatening was addressed to Israel and

Judah. Yet all who occupy a parallel position of privilege, and who are

guilty of similar insensibility, ingratitude, and apostasy, are subject to the

condemnation and the penalty pronounced upon the favored but sinful

descendants of Israel.

 

·         UNPARALLELED FAVORS ARE RECOUNTED. As a matter of

history, Israel had been treated in a singular manner, with unique favor.

However we may explain the fact, a fact it is which is here recalled to the

memory of the too oblivions Hebrews.

 

Ø      Israel had been treated as the family of God. The heavenly Father had

cared for, provided for, and protected His peculiar family, the children

whom He had adopted.

 

Ø      Israel had been brought up from the land of Egypt. To the marvelous

deliverance and interposition recorded by Moses, to the equally

marvelous guidance and guardianship experienced in the wilderness of

wandering, the sacred writers frequently refer. This is not surprising;

for never was a more signal instance of Divine compassion than that

afforded in the earlier passages of the national life of the chosen people.

 

Ø      Israel had been the object of the Divine knowledge, By this we

understand (for the language is accommodated to our human weakness)

that God had regarded and selected Israel in His inscrutable wisdom for

a certain purpose, viz. in order by Israel to make Himself known to

mankind at large. A peculiar honor was conferred upon the Hebrew

nation, not, however, for any excellence or worthiness in them, but for

reasons larger and higher than any which were generally apprehended.

 

·         UNPARALLELED INIQUITIES ARE IMPUTED. Idolatry was

charged upon those who had been distinguished as the recipients of the

revelation of the Divine unity. Immorality of various kinds was rife

amongst those who enjoyed the advantage of the purest moral code known

amongst the nations of mankind. The just principle was applied, “To whom

much is given of him will be much required.” And the application of this

principle made manifest the peculiar guilt of Israel. The Word of the Lord

by His prophet was therefore righteously severe; other nations were guilty

of equal enormities, but the privileges of Israel rendered their iniquities

more reprehensible.

 

·         UNPARALLELED CHASTISEMENT IS THREATENED. All the

iniquities of Israel were to be visited by Divine correction. In the remainder

of his prophecies Amos enlarges upon this theme. Whether we consider the

captivities and humiliations undergone by the favored nation in the period

immediately succeeding, or the history of subsequent centuries, we see the

truth of this prediction. Much more apparent is it when we look at the

national life of Israel as a whole; and, connecting the earlier apostasies with

the rejection of the Messiah, recognize in the present dispersion of. the

tribes the fulfillment of a Divine purpose and the inculcation of a Divine

lesson.

 

Before announcing more particularly the coming judgment, Amos, by a series

of little parables or comparisons, establishes his right to prophesy, and intimates

the necessity laid upon him to deliver his message.  He illustrates the truths that

all effects have causes, and that from the cause you can infer the effect.

 

3 “Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” - or, except

they have agreed? The “two” are God’s judgment and the prophet’s word.

These do, not coincide by mere chance, no more than two persons pursue

in company the same end without previous agreement. The prophet

announces God’s judgment because God has commissioned him; the

prophet is of one mind with God, therefore the Lord is with him, and

confirms his words. The application of the parables is seen in vs. 7-8.

The Septuagint, reading differently, has, “except they know one another.”

 

 

 

 

A Specially Blest People (vs. 2-3)

 

“You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will

punish you for all your iniquities. Can two walk together, except they be

agreed?” “You only have I known,” says God, “of all the families of the

earth.” What does this mean? It does not mean that he was ignorant of all

other people. God knows everything connected with each individual of all

generations. Nor does it mean that He had not been kind to other people.

“His tender mercies are over all the works of his hands.” But by the

expression, “I have known,” He means, “I have bestowed on you privileges

which I have bestowed on no other people” (see Romans 9:4-5). Now,

it is a fact that some men are far more highly favored by Heaven than

others. Some have more health, some more riches, some more intellect,

some more friendships, some more means of spiritual improvement. We

offer three remarks about specially favored people.

 

·         THEY ARE OFTENTIMES THE GREATEST SINNERS. Who of all

the people on the face of the earth were greater sinners than the Israelites?

Yet they were specially favored of Heaven. There was not a crime they

did not commit; and they filled up the measure of their iniquity BY

CRUCIFYING THE SON OF GOD.   America is a specially favored land,

but where is there more moral corruption? The fountain of moral iniquity

is as deep, as full, as noxious, as active, here as in the darkest and most

corrupt parts of the earth. It is true that civilization has so decorated it that its

loathsomeness is to some extent concealed; but here it is. The corpse is

painted, but it is still a putrid mass.

 

·         THEY ARE EXPOSED TO SPECIAL PUNISHMENT. “Therefore

will I punish you for all your iniquities.” Men are not to be envied simply

because they are endowed with special favors. Those very endowments,

unless they are faithfully used, only augment responsibility, deepen guilt,

and ensure a more terrible retribution. Where much has been given, much

will be required. “It will be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the

day of judgment” (Mark 6:11) “Therefore will I punish you.” I who know

all your sins, I who abhor all your sins, I who have power to punish you,

will execute vengeance.

 

·         THEY SHOULD, LIKE ALL PEOPLE, PLACE THEMSELVES IN

HARMONY WITH GOD. “Can two walk together, except they be

agreed?”

 

Ø      Agreement with God is essential to the well being of all intelligent

existences. No spirit in the universe can be happy without thorough

harmony with the will and mind of God. Heaven is happy because of

this harmony; hell is miserable because of antagonism to the

Divine mind.

 

Ø      The condition of all sinners is that of hostility to the will of God.

Indeed, enmity to God is the essence of sin. What, then, is the

conclusion?  Reconciliation. “We beseech you on behalf of Christ,

                        be ye reconciled unto God” (II Corinthians 5:20).

 

 

 

                        Communion and Concord Inseparable (v. 3)

 

“Do two walk together unless they have agreed?” The special reference of

this general question is not apparent. But the scope of the context suggests

two points on either or both of which it would throw light.

 

  1. The one is the prophet’s claim to be speaking the truth,
  2. the other is the people’s claim to be doing the right.

 

Between his words and their works there was utter incompatibility. Those

must be wrong if these were right, and vice versa. And the axiom quoted supplies

a decisive test. Amos walked with God — there could be no denying that; took

His side and sought His glory amidst prevailing defection and disobedience.

Must it not be argued from this that he was at one with God, and so in all his

utterances spoke agreeably to God’s will? Israel, on the other hand, had clearly

not agreed with God, for they were red handed in rebellion against Him.

Was not the inference from this resistless that they could not walk with Him,

here by faith or hereafter by sight? Consider here:

 

·         WALKING WITH GOD IS THE IDEAL OF HUMAN LIFE!   “Enoch

walked  with God” (Genesis 5:24).  That is a short biography. But there is

more in it,  more important in its character and more adequately expressed

than in many an  octavo volume. “They shall walk with me in white: 

for they are worthy”  (Revelation 3:4) is A SUMMARY OF THE JOY

AND GLORY OF  REDEEMED SPIRITS ON HIGH!  And life below

is ideal in proportion as  it approximates the life above. TO WALK

WITH GOD implies:

 

Ø      That we walk with the same purpose as God. The raison detre of

things is GOD’S GLORY FIRST  (Romans 11:36; Colossians 1:16), the

good of His people next (II Corinthians 4:15; Romans 8:28), then

the happiness of the race (I Timothy 4:10; Galatians 6:10), and

ULTIMATELY THE WELL BEING OF THE PLANET AS A

WHOLE ( a much superior existence than THE GREEN EARTH

POLICY and GUN CONTROL or A HYPOCRITICAL

EXCITEMENT OVER GLOBAL WARMING of the POLITICALLY

CORRECT TODAY – MAN’S IMMORALITY will bring about the

destruction of the earth far quicker than abuse of its resources! 

See what Revelation 11:18 has to say about them which “destroy

the earth”  – CY – 2013)  (Psalm 36:6; Romans 8:20-21). The attainment

of these objects in this order is God’s purpose as revealed in Scripture. With

this purpose it is the design and nature of religion to make man at one.

God’s ultimate purpose is to bring everything into one, both celestial and

terrestrial  - Ephesians 1:10 – CY – 2013)  By creating man in God’s image

he is endowed with a spiritual nature which exalts God (I Corinthians

10:31), loves the brethren (I John 3:14), consults the interests of others

(Philippians 2:4), and regards the life even of the beasts (Proverbs

12:10). In proportion as the godly endorse and homologate the Divine

purpose thus are they in the image of Christ (John 12:28; 13:1)

and do they walk with God.

 

Ø      That we walk like God. “The Christian,” says Joseph Cook, “is a man

who has changed eyes with God.” Subtle affinities have arisen involving a

marvelous unity of thought and aim. The end of our walking is God’s end,

and naturally HIS WAY  becomes our way. “The secret of the Lord is

with them that fear Him” (Psalm 25:14).  In Christ, “the Image of

 the invisible God” (Colossians 1:15) it became an open secret to all who

believe. He has left “us an example,” and there are no relations in life to

which it does not apply. We “follow His steps” (I Peter 2:21), and by

consequence walk like God, being “imitators of Him as dear children.”

(Ephesians 5:1)

 

Ø      That we walk in company with God. The ungodly are far from God, and

of set purpose keep their distance. But faith brings near and keeps near His

side. The humble, contrite heart, which is the home of faith, is also the

temple of God (Isaiah 57:15). The love by which faith works is his

welcome and feast (Revelation 3:20). The believer LIVES IN GOD’S

PRESENCE!  He walks by faith, holding on as it were by the Divine hand.

It is the promise and the thought of God’s presence with him that makes the

journey light (Isaiah 43:2), whilst the reality of it is the guarantee of

safety and ease. GOD WITH US,  we have:

 

Ø      unfailing provision,

Ø       unerring guidance, and

Ø       an invincible escort.

 

No marvel if they who thus travel “go from strength to strength.”

(Psalm 84:7)

 

·         THE AGREEMENT WITH GOD THAT IS THE CONDITION OF

            WALKING WITH HIM Walking with God is  not an occasional act,

            BUT A HABIT OF LIFE  and must arise out of AN ESTABLISHED

            RELATIONSHIP!

 

Ø      The parties must both be willing. Men are naturally at enmity with God,

and so averse to His company. They know not and desire not to know

His ways. and the expression of this feeling is the “Depart from us;

for we desire not the knowledge of thy ways!” (Job 21:14).

By which they decline the establishment of spiritual relations with God.

THE OPERATION OF GRACE, however, is one  “to will and to do

of God’s good pleasure,” (Philippians 2:13) and the result is “a willing

people in the day of God’s power.” (Psalm 110:3)  They choose God

(Joshua 24:15), desire His fellowship, and adopt the course that will

best consist with its enjoyment.

 

Ø      They must have arranged it. “Unless they have agreed.” Spiritual

relations are not accidental relations, nor such as men may drift into

unconsciously. There are understood objects to be intelligently adopted.

There are explicit terms:  “If any man will come afer me, let him deny

himself, and take up his cross and follow me.” (Matthew 16:24) They

are to be deliberately accepted. There is a distinct transaction in which

God and His way are adopted, and made our life King and life program

respectively - “Take with you words, and turn to the Lord:  Say unto

Him, Take away all iniquity, and receive us graciously” - (Hosea 14:2).

If it be a question:

 

o       of faith, we say, “Lord, I believe.”

o       of penitence, we say, “I abhor myself, and repent.”

o       of allegiance, we declare, “I will be for the Lord.”

o       of fellowship, we vow, “I will walk before the Lord in the

land of the living.”

 

Our walking with God is not only with consent, but by arrangement,

duly and solemnly subscribed.

 

Ø      They must be congenial spirits. Like draws to like. Companionship with

God bases itself in conformity to Him. If there be no affinity there will

be no association. If this fails, association will be broken off. Duty

must be our choice, or it will never be begun; and our joy, or it will

never be continued.  Walking with God implies a previous coming to

Him, and both are conditioned by a spiritual change creating us in

the Divine image. Hearts have begun to beat in unison when hands

are clasped for life.

 

·         THE BEARING OF THIS MAXIM ON THE CASE IN HAND. The

two whose walking together is in question are Jehovah and the prophet,

according to some; Jehovah and the nation, according to others. But as it is

a general maxim, it may be legitimately applied to both, and every other

case on which it can throw light.

 

Ø      The words of a teacher who walks with God will be on the whole

agreeable to His will. The authenticity of Amos’s message was called in

question by many. But he was on God’s side in this controversy with

Israel. He spoke as it were out of the arms of the Divine fellowship. The

truth of his deliverance was therefore a foregone conclusion. With every

                        religious teacher the same principle holds. Communion with God gives

                        insight into truth ATTAINABLE IN NO OTHER WAY!   It conditions

                        that “unction from the Holy One” by which “we know  all things.”

(I John 2:20).  The best guarantee is TO BE SPIRITUALLY

MINDED!  “The anointing” by Christ in the work of grace, among

other benefits, teacheth of all things, and is truth”  (I John 2:27).

Let a man read the Bible, so to speak, over God’s shoulder, and the

thing he will read  out of it will be TRUTH!

 

Ø      A life of rebellion cannot possibly be a walk with God. The prophet

foretold to Israel a final rupture of visible covenant relations. And the

prophecy was along the lines of natural fitness. The parties were already

alienated in heart and sympathy, and in the nature of things formal

separation must follow. To walk with God whilst fighting with Him was

an unworkable arrangement. The men who try it are men whose

religious life is failure. When hearts go apart their owners go after

them; and the soul, loveless today, will be GODLESS TOMORROW!   

Alienation leads to  apostasy, and the apostate  is ipso facto (by the

very fact) AN OUTLAW!   Are our affections  given to Christ in

self-surrender and love and happy trust?

 

It is the one condition of walking with Him to any purpose of spiritual

effect. Is the dedication made maintained in unswerving true allegiance?

See to that, for the beginning of estrangement is as the letting out of

water, and what is deflection now will be defection in the next stage.

 

 

 

                                    Harmonious Fellowship (v. 3)

 

These words have passed into a proverb, which fact is in itself a proof that

they accord with human experience.

 

·         HARMONY OF SENTIMENT AND PURPOSE ALONE CAN

ENSURE AGREEMENT IN LIFE. The spiritual is a key to the outward

life. And this holds not only with regard to the individual, but with regard

to society. Because people live together in a house, they are not necessarily

a true family; because they meet together in an ecclesiastical building, they

are not therefore a true congregation; because they occupy the same

territory, they are not therefore a true nation. There must be inner accord

in order that fellowship may be real.

 

·         LACK OF HARMONY OF HEART WILL SURELY MANIFEST

ITSELF IN LIFE. This is the other side of the same law. The strife of

society are an indication of conflicting principles. Even Christ came to

send, not peace, but a sword. Where there is no agreement, one will walk

in this road and another in that. External uniformity is of little value. In

fact, manifest discord may be of service in revealing the want of spiritual

unity, and so leading to repentance.

 

·         IN THE RELATION BETWEEN GOD AND MAN AGREEMENT

IS ONLY TO BE ATTAINED BY THE CONFORMITY OF MAN’S

MIND AND WILL TO GOD’S.  (Romans 12:2)  It is not to be expected,

it is not to be desired, that God’s purpose should bend to man’s. The human

ignorance must accept the Divine wisdom, and the human error and sin must

embrace the Divine grace and holiness. Such is the teaching of revelation, of

the Law, and of the gospel.

 

·         WHERE THERE IS WANT OF HARMONY BETWEEN (GOD

AND MAN, IT IS FOR MAN TO SEEK THE RECONCILIATION AND

UNITY WHICH ALONE CAN BRING ABOUT MAN’S WELFARE. If

these blessings were not offered, there would be room to doubt their

accessibility. But the revelation of God’s counsels in Scripture assures us

that our heavenly Father desires that His children should be at one with Him.

 

4  “Will a lion roar in the forest, when he hath no prey? will a young

lion cry out of his den, if he have taken nothing?”  Will a lion roar, etc.?

The lion roars when he has his pray in sight, and is about to spring upon it.

So God makes the prophet utter His voice because He is ready to execute

vengeance. The second clause expresses the same fact in different terms.

The young lion (kephir) is not a whelp, but one able to provide for itself.

He growls over the prey which he has in his lair. So Israel lies helpless as

the words of God’s threatenings strike upon him.

 

5 “Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no gin is for him?

shall one take up a snare from the earth, and have taken nothing at

all?” The thought here is that the punishment is deserved as well as

certain. A bird is not caught unless a trap is set for it. The trap which the

sinner sets for himself is sin. Can a bird fall in a snare (pach) upon the

earth, where no gin (moqesh) is for him? i.e. is set for him? The “gin” is

a net with a stick for a spring, which flew up when touched, carrying part

of the net with it, and thus the bird was enclosed and caught. The

Septuagint  probably read yoqesh, as they translate, ἄνευ ἐξευτοῦ -

aneu exeutou - - “without a fowler.” So the Vulgate, absque

aucupe. The second clause should be, Shall a snare (pach) spring up from

the ground without taking anything? The snare, or trap stick, would not

rise if it had not caught something. The sin is there, and the sinners shall

surely not escape. When God appoints retributive punishments for the

guilty, and announces the same by His prophets, THEY MAY BE

EXPECTED WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY!

 

6 “Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid?

shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?”

The prophet must needs speak: shall not his denunciation arouse

alarm among the people, as the trumpet suddenly heard in a city excites the

terror of the inhabitants (compare Ezekiel 33:2-5)? Shall there be evil in a

city, and the Lord hath not done it? The “evil” is affliction, calamity,

malum poenae. As states have no future, all temporal calamities in their

case may rightly be regarded as the punishment of sin. Thus the ruin

impending, on Israel was sent by the Lord, whose agent was the enemy

now approaching. All phenomena are ascribed in the Bible to Divine

operation, no second causes being allowed to interfere with this

appropriation (see Job 1.; I Samuel 18:10; I Kings 22:19-23; Isaiah 45:7).

The verb “do” is often used absolutely, the context defining the result.

 

 

 

                                                Retribution (vs. 4-6)

 

“Will a lion roar in the forest, when he hath no prey?” etc. These verses

suggest certain remarks on retribution.

 

·         RETRIBUTION SPRINGS OUT OF THE NATURE OF THINGS.

The lion roars in the forest for prey; the young lion cries in his den from an

instinct of nature. They are hungry, and they roar; they crave for food, and

they cry; this is natural. The lion is quiet till he sees his prey, but roars at

the sight of it, and thereby inspires it with such terror that it is deprived of

the power of escape. In like manner the young lion which has been weaned

and is just beginning to hunt for prey, will lie silent in the den till it is

brought near, when the smell of it will rouse him from his quiet. Poiset, in

his travels, states that the lion has two different modes of hunting his prey.

When not very hungry, he contents himself with watching behind a bush

for the animal which is the object of his attack, till it approaches; when by a

sudden leap he springs at it, and seldom misses his aim. But if he is

famished he does not proceed so quietly; but, impatient and full of rage, he

leaves his den and fills with his terrific roar the echoing forest. His voice

inspires all beings with terror; no creature deems itself safe in its retreat; all

flee they know not whither, and by this means some fall into his fangs. The

naturalness of punishment, perhaps, is the point at which the prophet aims

in the similitude. It is so with moral retribution. It arises from the

constitution of things. Punishment grows out of vice. Misery follows

iniquity. Every sin carries with it its own penalty. It does not require the

Almighty to inflict any positive suffering on the sinner. He has only to leave

him alone, and his sins will find him out.

 

·         RETRIBUTION IS NOT ACCIDENTAL, BUT ARRANGED. “Can a

bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no gin is for him? shall one take

up a snare from the earth, and have taken nothing at all?” The bird is not

taken in a snare by chance. The fowler has been there and made

preparation for its entanglement and death. Every sinner is a bird that must

be caught; the snare is laid in the constitution of things. Instruments were

prepared by the providence of God for the capture of the Israelites, which

would certainly do their work.

 

·         RETRIBUTION ALWAYS SOUNDS A TIMELY ALARM. “Shall a

trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid?” Heaven does

not punish without warnings. Nature warns, providence warns, conscience

warns; there is no sinful soul in which the trumpet of alarm does not sound.

 

·         RETRIBUTION, HOWEVER IT COMES, IS ALWAYS DIVINE.

“Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it?” GOD

IS ALL IN ALL!   He has established the connection between sin and

suffering. He has planned and laid the snare. The everlasting destruction

with which the sinner is punished comes from the presence of the Lord

and the glory of His power.

 

 

 

 

Calamity One of the Works of God (v. 6)

 

It is not sin, but suffering, that is here meant. We are to regard temporal

calamities as the warning voice of God, a manifestation of His character,

and a corrective expression of His displeasure. God maintains His

controversy with Israel. The verses before contain language of

unimpeachable equity, ill-requited kindness, and injured honor. On every

ground the threatened punishment was merited, and only in mercy had it

been suspended so long. There is a natural atheism in the human heart, a

constantly prevailing tendency to forgot God. This tendency is most

powerful in prosperity, and must often be counterworked by a

dispensation of adversity. Not that Divine judgments, acting on human

corruption, necessarily lead to repentance. But in God’s hand they have often

been overruled to this effect, and it is in this reclaiming and reforming capacity

that they are alluded to in this text.

 

  • WE DISTINGUISH THE AGENCY OF JEHOVAH FROM CHANCE.

“Chance” is a word much used, and little understood. When we say that an

event has happened by chance, we mean either that it had no cause, which

is atheism, or that we do not know the cause, which is an abuse of

language. CHANCE  in fact, is nothing but a term of human ignorance. Yet

the use of the word implies either atheism, denying the Divine existence, or

naturalism, denying His superintending agency; the two coming to the same

thing, for we might as well have no God as no providence. The sentiment

of our text is the refutation of both, and as such is but the echo of all

Scripture. “ALL THINGS ARE OF GOD” (II Corinthians 5:18).

Not creation only, but PROVIDENCE,  which is as wonderful as a

continuous creation. Not great events only, but the very least, without

any one of which the whole machinery would be incapable of A

SINGLE REVOLUTION.   How beautifully yet powerfully is this

brought out by Christ in his illustration from the sparrows (Matthew

10:29-31)! If a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without our Father, much

less can a whole city. When evil is in a city, it is not a visitation of chance,

but of the hand of God, under which it has come.

 

  • THE DIVINE AGENCY IS HERE DISTINGUISHED FROM THAT

OF IDOLS. Something to worship is a necessity of human nature. Hence

men, when they forsake the true God, SET UP A FALSE ONE IN

HIS PLACE!   (For the United States today, one of the gods is

MATERIALISM – CY – 2013)  The existence and power of this idol

they believe without proof, and even against presumption. Unconquerable

incredulity in reference to the true God becomes irrational credulity in

reference to the false once. Thus ATHEISM IS A QUESTION MORE

OF THE HEART THAN THE HEAD!   Men do not like to

retain God in their knowledge (Romans 1:23, 28), and so discard Him

for gods of their own devising. This fact shows polytheism a term of

atheism. And it was demonstrably so with the Jews. The obverse of

apostasy with them was always idolatry; and this text affirms that Jehovah,

whom they had forsaken, not any senseless idol which they had chosen,

dominated history and sent good and evil to men (see Isaiah 41:21-24;

Jeremiah 10:3-16, especially God, …..hath stretched out the heavens

by His discretion……and bringeth for the wind out of His treasures.

vs. 12-13 – think of the implication with Hurricanes Katrina and

Sandy – and don’t forget the recent tsunamis in Indonesia and Japan

Luke 21:25 - just don’t take them out of the context of this homily – CY –

2013). We think we are in no danger of making their mistake. But the world,

in its ambition, avarice, or pleasure, may take away our hearts from God,

and become their idol, climbing to his throne. And we give it credit often for

what God does and alone can do (for instance, referring to Mother Nature –

CY – 2013), and to that extent misread the providential events in which

God is dealing with us.

 

  • THE DIVINE AGENCY IS TO BE DISTINGUISHED FROM THE

AGENCY OF SECOND CAUSES. The deification of nature is a common

practice. Conventionally, nature is a kind of mystical personification of

some unknown existence, and to which the omnipotence denied to God

 is freely attributed.  If “nature” does a thing, it is assumed that God has no

hand in it, and that it wants no explanation further. “Nature is that created

realm of being or substance which has an acting, a going on or process

from within itself, under and by its own laws” (Bushnell). But these laws

are just “the actuating power of God.” They are not powers in

themselves, but only THE RULES BY WHICH HIS POWER

OPERATES!   We have various kinds of seasons which we trace to

various causes in nature. But these are second causes, and under the

sovereign control of the First Cause. “Can the heavens give showers?

art not thou he, O Lord our God?... for thou hast made all these

things” (Jeremiah 14:22). Air, earth, and sea, and all that they contain,

are subject to Him (Psalm 104:14; 148:8). From the natural cause of this

or that we must rise to Him who makes it what and puts it where it is,

and gives it a commission to work. “All things are of God.”

 

“This truth philosophy, though eagle-eyed

In nature’s tendencies, oft o’erlooks;

And having found His instrument, forgets

Or disregards, or, more presumptuous still,

Denies the Power that wields it.”

 

The same principle rules events in which men are agents. “Men are in

God’s hand” as well as matter. The King of Assyria was simply the rod

with which God struck Israel (Isaiah 10:5-16). In attributing temporal

evils to Gods sovereign control of things, distinguish between sovereignty

and caprice. For what God does He could assign the best of reasons.  He

exercises His sovereignty in declining to do so. But He tells us that the great

general cause of suffering is sin. Evil does not come on us as creatures, but

as sinners. The infliction of it has not to do with SOVEREIGNTY

 but with EQUITY.  All good is from God, all evil from the sinner. All good is

gratuitous, all evil is deserved. All evil is righteous retribution, all good is

free and sovereign love. Nor is suffering destitute of a large benevolent

element. On the contrary, it often serves a merciful purpose, and would

always do so WERE IT PROPERLY RECEIVED!   When the sun of

prosperity fails to soften, God casts men into the furnace of trial, if perchance

the stronger method may prevail. If there be evil in your city, then consider who

sends it, on what account, and for what purpose; so, it may be, you will “turn to

him that smiteth you,” as he means you should. (From a sermon by Ralph

Wardlaw, D.D., supplemented and condensed.)

 

 

 

 

                                                Warning Notes (v. 6)

 

There is something in this interrogatory style that arrests the attention and

excites inquiry. Combined as it is with bold figures of speech, it gives both

vivacity and impressiveness to the prophecies of the herdsman of Tekoah.

 

·         THE PRESENCE OF CALAMITY. The phrase, “evil in a city,” is

certainly vague, but how much it may imply! How many forms of misery

may be suggested by the expression! — e.g. famine, pestilence, war, riot,

and faction, all are evils, and evils which do not always come singly to a

community.

 

·         THE MORAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CALAMITY. The suggestion of

the prophet is that “the Lord hath done it.” We are not warranted in

applying the test of our opinions to events permitted by Divine providence.

It is foolish to profess ourselves able to interpret all the events, and

especially all the calamities, that occur; to see God’s “judgments” in all

human distresses. Yet no devout mind can question that there is a very

important sense in which, when evil happens to a city or a country, the

Lord hath done it. The world is governed by moral laws; but the Governor

is the supreme Creator of all things, the supreme Disposer of all events.

Disobedience to His authority and ordinances entails suffering, privation,

disaster. Men reap as they sow.

 

·         THE PROPHETIC WARNING OF COMING CALAMITY. The

prophet was a watchman, as Ezekiel so vigorously shows us, whose office

it is to recognize the approach of ill, and to give the people timely and

faithful warning. The same office is still fulfilled by those who being dead

yet speak, whose declarations concerning Divine government remain for

the instruction of all generations. The Bible abounds with admonitions to

which cities and nations will do well to give heed. And all ministers of

religion are bound to explain to the people the principles of moral rule and

law, of moral retribution, of repentance and reformation.

 

·         THE PROPER EFFECT OF CALAMITY. The immediate result is

that described in the text fear, trembling, alarm. But the remote result,

that chiefly to be desired, is the turning of men’s hearts unto the Lord, and

their consequent acceptance and forgiveness.

 

7 “Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but He revealeth His secret

unto His servants the prophets.” This and the following verse apply the

foregoing, parables All the evils announced come from the Lord; but He brings

none of them on the people without first warning by his prophets (compare

John 13:19; 14:29). His secret (sod); unrevealed till then. Septuagint,

παιδείαν paideian - instruction.

 

 

 

                                    The Revelation of Secrets (v. 7)

 

That there must be assumed to be some limitation to this broad statement is

manifest. It is not intended to declare that God made His prophets

acquainted with all His counsels and intentions, but rather that revelation

and inspiration are realities, and that prophecy is a Divine ordinance.

 

·         THE ACTIONS OF GOD ARE THE RESULT OF DELIBERATE

COUNSEL AND PURPOSE. This way of representing the conduct of

Divine affairs is out of harmony with much current teaching of our time.

We are often told that it is childish to conceive of God as personal, as

thinking, feeling, and acting. But so far from such representations being

derogatory to the Divine dignity, they do, in fact, enhance our conceptions

of Him. Reason and will are the lofty attributes of mind; and whilst the

Eternal is not bound by the limitations which circumscribe our faculties,

these faculties are the finite reflection of what is infinite in Him. It is the

glory of our Scriptures that they reveal to us a God who commands, not a

blind awe, but an intelligent veneration, and elicits an appreciative and

grateful love.

 

·         THE COUNSELS AND PURPOSES OF GOD ARE REVEALED TO

THE SYMPATHETIC MINDS OF HIS SERVANTS THE PROPHETS.

The mode of this communication is concealed from us; it may have been

but partially understood even by the prophets themselves. There is nothing

unreasonable in the fellowship of mind between the Creator and created

spirits. The human consciousness is above all vehicles surely the fittest

medium for the intercourse between the Divine and the finite. God has His

own servants employed in His household, His husbandry; and He chooses His

own agents for the several works He has for them to do. Among His

servants are the prophets — men selected and qualified to speak forth his

mind and will to their fellow men. Perhaps we are too restricted in the view

we commonly take of the prophetic office. We know that there were

schools of prophets among the Hebrews, and that there was an order of

prophets in the primitive Church. There were oases in which by the agency

of prophets new truth was revealed, but there were also cases in which

prophets were inspired to apprehend and republish TRUTH already familiar!

Prophets in this second sense there certainly are among us to this day.

 

·         THE COUNSELS AND PURPOSES OF GOD COMMUNICATED

BY THE PROPHETS DEMAND OUR REFERENTIAL ATTENTION

AND CHEERFUL OBEDIENCE. When the Omniscient declares His mind,

when the Omnipotent unfolds His purpose, by the agency He has chosen,

the revelation is first made by the Spirit to the human minister, and then by

the human minister to his fellow men. The holiness of the Divine character

and the righteousness of the Divine government are thus brought

effectively before the minds of the intelligent and responsible sons of men.

The secret is revealed, not simply to excite wonder, but to guide conduct.

The appropriate attitude of those privileged with a revelation so precious is

that expressed in the resolution, “All the words which the Lord hath

            spoken will we do.”  (Exodus 24:3)

 

 

                       

                        The Hounds that Bay before They Bite (v. 7)

 

The prophet speaks here as if he were announcing axiomatic truth. And it

is nothing less. It might be argued from reason; it is historic fact; and it is a

prominent Scripture doctrine.

 

  • JUDGMENT NEVER COMES WITHOUT WARNING. The Deluge,

the destruction of Sodom, the plagues of Egypt, and the fall of Jerusalem,

are cases in point. Sometimes judgment has taken people unawares

(Matthew 24:39), but this is because the warning has been disregarded

(Genesis 19:14; 6:3). When there has been no warning the judgment

has been provoked, not by a course of wickedness, but by A SINGLE

FLAGRANT TRANSGRESSION  in connection with which warning was

out of the question (Exodus 32:27-28; Numbers 26:10; Acts 12:23).

The warning of coming judgment is:

 

Ø      A disclosure of sin. To allow men to sin unheeded, and to find it

satisfactory, would be to give amnesty to evil doing and practically

to encourage it. To erect the gallows of impending judgment, on the

other hand, brings into sight the fact of sin, and emphasizes its demerit.

Next to execution, the sentence of death is A REVELATION TO

THE CRIMINAL OF THE ENORMITY OF HIS CRIME!   

It is a mental association of guilt with penalty, and so measuring of

its moral proportions. It is also:

 

Ø      A deterrent from sin. Judgment executed without warning loses half

its value. The fear of the rod is a wholesome restraint on the folly of

the child (Modern secularism and progressivism has made a great

error and miscalculation in removing fear as a deterrent – i.e. –

removing the paddle from schools, their opposition to the death

penalty; legalizing marijuana and drugs; removing taboos from sex;

facilitating abortions for convenience, ad nauseum – CY – 2013);

 greater often than the actual blow, because it operates through a longer

period. God’s moral government in its relation to sin aims at

CURE RATHER THAN PUNISHMENT,  at PREVENTION

RATHER THAN EITHER!   His blows fall only after His threats

have failed to move (Proverbs 1:24; Jeremiah 6:10-11). Accordingly:

 

Ø      To denounce judgment sometimes makes it unnecessary to inflict it.

A notable instance was that of Nineveh. (Book of Jonah) If her repentance

were more common, her escape would be more common also (Matthew

12:41). God frights with the thunder of his threats, that he may not be

compelled to smite with the lightning of His judgments. He makes

a display of His resistless forces that the rebels may yield without going

into action. “Turn ye, turn ye: why will ye die?” (Ezekiel 33:11)

That is the message of His open preparations to destroy.

 

  • THIS WARNING REACHES MEN THROUGH THE PROPHETS.

On His way to the establishment of personal relations (It is wonderful that

God is a ONE-ON-ONE GOD!  – CY -2013), God always treats

with men through mediators. Covenants are made with representatives,

such as Adam, Noah, Abraham, and Christ. Justifying righteousness is

negotiated typically through a priesthood, and anti-typically THROUGH

JESUS CHRIST!   So saving knowledge is negotiated THROUGH

THE HOLY GHOST  and by the instrumentality of inspired men.

 

Ø      This was the only feasible way. Not every man is fit to receive a

revelation direct from God. To do so implies mental and moral conditions

that are realized in but a small percentage of men. His revelation must

reach many through a third party in any case. If the worse qualified must be

spoken to through the better qualified, it is only carrying out the principle

to speak to both through the best qualified of all, i.e. the prophet selected

by God Himself. The Scripture is God’s revelation, and adequate to man’s

need (II Timothy 3:15-17). The attempt to substitute for it an “inner

light” or any other device, is to substitute our own nonentity for God’s

reality.

 

Ø      It tends to call faith into action. GOD WANTS HIS WORD BELIEVED!   

And He wants it believed in a certain way and on certain grounds.

To believe what we see is not the  faith He wants (John 20:29), nor

properly faith at all.  “Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet

have believed.” Only such believing is intelligent or voluntary, and

therefore possessed of moral qualities.  If God revealed His will directly

to each individual, bearing it in resistlessly on his consciousness, the moral

discipline involved in faith would be lost to men.

 

Ø      It secures a record of Gods message for universal use. A revelation

given to men individually would be only for the individual, and for the time

then being, It would neither be common property nor permanent property.

And it is worth being made both. God’s way is one in all ages. He is in the

same mind about sin, and deals with it on the same principles always. The

record of what He has done is the prophecy of what in similar

circumstances He will do. The prophet wrote so much of his message as

had permanent interest, and the aggregate of such inspired deliverances is

the Scripture, which is “a light in a dark place until the day dawn.”

(II Peter 1:19)  It is not a revelation for an individual merely. Having served

its turn with one, it is no less available for others in endless succession.

 

·         GOD’S PROPHETS ARE FIRST OF ALL HIS SERVANTS. “His

servants the prophets.” The explanatory words, “His servants,” widen

greatly the sentiment of the clause.

 

Ø      To prophesy under Divine direction is itself an act of service. There is

a wide sense in which all are God’s servants who carry out any of His

purposes. Thus Cyrus and Nebuchadnezzar (Isaiah 45:1; Jeremiah 25:9)

are styled respectively the “anointed” and the “servant” of God,

because they were designated to and did a work for Him. This was a

purely external relation, but it was real. All the prophets, even the

wicked Balaam, were God’s servants in this sense. They represented

His interest. They went His errand. They carried His message. They

labored to accomplish His purpose. Their exercise of the prophetic

office was service.

 

Ø      Official relations have their basis in personal relations. Shepherds and

sheep alike come into the fold by the Door, Jesus Christ (John 10:1-14).

All come in to the effect of their own salvation first, and then fall

into rank as gatherers-in of others. First faith, and then works, is thus the

spiritual order; faith establishing personal relations with Christ, and

work, among other things, trying to get others to do likewise. Hence

Church officers are to be chosen out of the number of Church members.

The conditions of spiritual work are spiritual gifts, and the condition

of spiritual gifts is to be in the spiritual connection “I am the way,

the truth and the life.” (John 14:6;>Ephesians 2:18).

 

8 “The lion hath roared, who will not fear? the Lord GOD hath

spoken, who can but prophesy?” As the lion’s roar forces every one to

fear, so the Divine call of the prophet forces him to speak (Jeremiah 20:9;

Ezekiel 2:8; I Corinthians 9:16). St. Gregory, moralizing, takes the lion

in a spiritual sense: “After the power of his Creator has been made known to

him, the strength of his adversary ought not to be concealed from him, in order

that he might submit himself the more humbly to his defender, the more

accurately he had learned the wickedness of his enemy, and might more

ardently seek his Creator, the more terrible he found the enemy to be

whom he had to avoid. For it is certain that he who less understands the

danger he has escaped, loves his deliverer less; and that he who considers

the strength of his adversary to be feeble, regards the solace of his defender

as worthless” (‘Moral.,’ 32:14). Of course, this exposition does not regard

the context.

 

 

No Smoke Without Fire (vs. 3-8)

 

God cannot utter empty threats. His every declaration is bona fide. When

He roars HE IS ABOUT TO REND.. Let, then, THE DOOMED SINNER

TREMBLE!   For all his insensibility he is no better than a dead man.

 

  • SIN INVOLVES DISCONNECTION FROM A HOLY GOD. “Can

two walk together,” etc.? This deep principle involves that:

 

Ø      Israel, quarrelling with God, cannot reckon on His company.

For so far God had associated with them. In Egypt, in the wilderness,

in Canaan, He had vouchsafed them close companionship. But their

rebellious attitude against Him, approaching as it was a climax of

irreconcilableness, must make a continuance of intimate relations

impossible.

 

Ø      The prophet, walking as he did with God, must be regarded as in

agreement with Him, and so expressing His will. Amos spoke as

God’s servant and mouthpiece. He looked at Israel’s sin from God’s

standpoint. In reference to it he was as emphatically associated with

God as he was dissociated from them. Underlying this formal association

it must be believed there was real agreement. “He whom God hath

 sent speaketh the words of God.”  (John 3:34)

 

  • WHEN THE THUNDER OF GOD’S THREATENINGS IS HEARD,

THE LIGHTNING OF HIS JUDGMENTS IS IMMINENT. That peril

is sure and near is taught in a series of similes of a graphic kind.

 

Ø      When God utters His war cry it is evident that He is just about

to strike His enemy. (v. 4.) The lion roars when he has marked his

prey, and is about to spring. God sees the sinful nation ripe for judgment.

He sees that the time for sending it has come. His roar out of Zion

(ch.1:2) is, therefore, the prelude to striking His prey forthwith. “The

threatenings of the Word and providence of God are not bugbears to

frighten children and fools, but are certain inferences from the sin of

man and certain presages of the judgments of God” (Matthew Henry).

 

Ø      When God reaches forth His hand there is something to take, and

within His reach (v. 5.).  It is the lighting of the bird on the trap that

snaps it. If there were no trap laid no bird would be caught. If there

were no bird in the trap it would not rise from the ground. Israel is the

bird, and God is the Fowler, and His judgment is the snare, and the

lesson of all is that she is already in God’s destroying grasp.

 

When some are already alarmed it shows that DANGER TO

ALL IS REAL AND CLOSE  (v. 6, “Is a trumpet blown …

and the people not be afraid?”)   The prophet, who knew what

was coming, was alarmed, and those like minded with him. The note

of alarm was already ringing over the land. Signs of evil will not show

themselves until the evil is comparatively at hand. So surely as the

smoke rises the fire is kindling.

 

Ø      When misfortune falls it is a proof that God has been at work.

 “Does misfortune happen in the city,” etc.? (v. 6). “All things are

of God”  (I Corinthians 5:18), is an axiom that in one sense or other

covers all events,  whether good or bad.  The qualification of it is that

the sin of any of them is exclusively of man. God “creates evil”

(Isaiah 45:7) — the evil of suffering — whilst the evil of sin He allows

us to create, that He may bring out of it GREATER GOOD!

 

  • GOD WARNS HIS PROPHETS OF EVIL BEFORE IT COMES.

(v. 7.) The prophet is a negotiator, hearing the truth from God, and

handing it on to men. God does not destroy men unwarned, nor warn them

but through His accredited messengers. The history of His judgments

illustrates this. Through Noah He revealed the coming deluge, through Lot

the destruction of Sodom, through Joseph the famine in Egypt, through

Moses the Egyptian plagues, through Jonah the sentence on Nineveh, and

through Christ and His apostles the destruction of Jerusalem. Thus God

has ever warned the world of coming judgments in order that it may

not involve THEM/YOU/ME! “He foretelleth the evil to come that He may

not be compelled to inflict it.

 

  • GOD’S TRUE PROPHETS CANNOT BUT SPEAK HIS

MESSAGE. (v. 8.)  (“For we cannot but speak the things which we

have seen and heard” Acts 4:20).  It is His will that they should prophesy.

He tells them His purposes mainly with a view to this. To prophesy is their

function and duty, and is made their business. They are moved at the sight

of coming evil. They are in sympathy with the Divine compassion,

GIVING A LAST CHANCE TO THE DOOMED and so, like the

apostles, they “cannot but speak the things they have seen and heard”

(I Corinthians 9:16-17; Acts 4:19-20).  Moses was not excused though

slow of speech (Exodus 4:10), nor Isaiah though of polluted lips (Isaiah

6:5), nor Jeremiah because he was a child (Jeremiah 1:6-9). Ezekiel was

bidden ‘be not rebellious like that rebellious house’ (Ezekiel 2:8);

and when Jeremiah would keep silence he saith, ‘His Word was in mine

heart as a burning fire, shut up in my bones, and I was weary with

 forbearing, and I could not stay’” (Jeremiah 20:9).  Taken in connection,

vs. 7-8 reveal a perfect arrangement for making known God’s purpose in

reference to sin. God anticipates action by a communication to His prophets,

and the prophets execute orders, and hand the communication on.

 

Having vindicated his own commission, Amos proclaims in vs. 9-15,

what God purposes to do unto Israel. He is bidden to summon the heathen

Ashdod and Egypt to bear witness to the iniquities of Samaria, which

should bring about the overthrow of the kingdom, the destruction of the

city with its altars and palaces, and the exile of the people.

 

The passage is a summons to the nations to appear as witnesses of Israel’s flagrant sin,

and her dreadful punishment. There are many articles in her predicted woe. Not

least of these is condemnation by the heathen, who for less heinous sins

were to be themselves destroyed. When a professed follower of God

apostatizes in such a fashion that even God’s enemies cry shame, and

endures a corresponding punishment in their sight, THE CUP OF HIS

INIQUITY AND OF HIS RETRIBUTION ARE BOTH FULL!

 

 

 

                        The Irrepressibility of Moral Truth (vs. 7-8)

 

“Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but He revealeth His secret unto His

servants the prophets,” etc. These words mean that although punishment

for the guilty Israelites was natural, arranged, and withal Divine, yet it

would come according to a warning made to them through the prophets,

and which these would feel compelled to deliver. The words suggest two

remarks.

 

·         GOD HAS MADE A SPECIAL REVELATION TO HIS SERVANTS.

“He revealeth His secret unto His servants the prophets.” In all ages God

has selected men to whom He has made communications of Himself. In

times past He spake unto the fathers by the prophets. In truth, He makes

special revelations of Himself to all true men. “Shall I hide from Abraham

the thing that I do?” (Genesis 18:17) “The secrets of the Lord are with them

that  fear Him, and He will show them His covenant.” (Psalm 25:14)  God

has given to all men  a general revelation. In nature without and within, in

the material domain, and in the spiritual. But He makes a special revelation

to some. The Bible is indeed a special revelation.

 

Ø      Special in its occasion. It is made on account of the abnormal moral

condition into which man has fallen — made in consequence of human

sin and its dire consequences. Had there been no sin, in all probability

we should have had no written revelation. The great book of nature

would have sufficed.

 

Ø      Special in its doctrines The grand characteristic truth is this —

that God so loved men as sinners that He gave His only begotten

Son for their redemption.  (John 3:16)  This is the epitome of

the gospel,

 

·         THAT THE RIGHT RECEPTION OF THIS SPECIAL

REVELATION NECESSITATES PREACHING. “The lion hath roared,

who will not fear? the Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy?” The

idea is that the men who have rightly taken the truth into them can no more

conceal it than men can avoid terror at the roar of the lion. There are some

truths which men may receive and feel no disposition to communicate, such

as the truths of abstract science, which have no relation to the social heart.

But gospel truths have such a relation to the tenderest and profoundest

affections of the spirit, that their genuine recipients find them to be

irrepressible. They feel like Jeremiah, that they have fire shut up in their

bones; like the apostles before the Sanhedrin, “We cannot but speak the

things that we have seen and heard;” like Paul, “Necessity is laid upon me

to preach the gospel.” “Who can but prophesy?” None but those who have

received the truth.

 

9 “Publish in the palaces at Ashdod, and in the palaces in the land of

Egypt, and say, Assemble yourselves upon the mountains of

Samaria, and behold the great tumults in the midst thereof, and the

oppressed in the midst thereof.” Ashdod (ch.1:8). God bids the prophets

(publish ye) summon the inhabitants of the palaces of Philistia (of which Ashdod

is the representative) and Egypt, because they had been the chief enemies of His

people, and in their sight had mighty works been wrought for Israel; thus

they could appreciate her iniquity and ingratitude. Some, translating al

“upon,” say that the prophets are bidden publish their message upon the

flat roofs of the palaces, that it may be heard far and near (compare II Samuel

16:22; Matthew 10:27). Keil thinks that not all the inhabitants of the town are

summoned, but only those who live in the palaces, who alone “could pronounce

a correct sentence as to the mode of life commonly adopted in the palaces of

Samaria.” But this seems an unnecessary refinement.  Assemble yourselves

upon the mountains of Samaria. The city  of Samaria was built on a hill

which stands alone in the valley or basin, but it is surrounded by higher mountains,

from whence, though at some distance, spectators could look down into its streets,

and, as from the seats in an amphitheater, behold the iniquities transacted there.

Their implacable enemies, the Philistines, and those they were then courting,

the Egyptians (Hosea 7:11; 12:1), are alike called to witness this spectacle.

Tumult; the disorder, where might makes right.- Septuagint,  θαυμαστὰ πολλὰ -

 thaumasta polla - many marvels -  as if the sight were a surprise

even to the heathen. The oppressed (ashuqim); better, the oppressions,

i.e. of the weak at the hands of the powerful (compare 2:6; 4:1). It was

 to the eternal disgrace of Israel that there were doings in her cities

which the very heathen would condemn.

 

10 “For they know not to do right, saith the LORD, who store up

violence and robbery in their palaces.” They know not how to do right.

The Samaritans have lost all sense of justice, the foundation of social life

(Jeremiah 4:22). The Septuagint -  Οὐκ ἔγνις α} ἔσται ἐναντίον αὐτῆς -

Ouk egnis a estai enantion autaes - She knew not what things shall be

before her. Store up violence; i.e. the fruits of violence and robbery

(ταλαιπωρίαν,talaiporianmisery - Septuagint), what they had wrung

from the poor by oppression and rapine.

 

 

 

                                   

                        The Corruption of Conscience (v. 10)

 

The conception of Amos is remarkable for grandeur. He sees in prophetic

vision the approaching siege of Samaria, the capital of the northern

kingdom, and poetically summons the Egyptians and Philistines to gather

themselves together upon the surrounding hills, and to witness the tumults

within the city, the assaults from without, and the impending ruin. But the

moral significance of history, in the prophet’s mind, transcends the pictorial

interest; and in this verse he gives utterance to a profound and awful truth

with regard to human nature. Wrongdoing corrupts the conscience and

interferes with a correct perception of right and goodness.

 

·         IT IS A LAW OF HUMAN NATURE THAT CONDUCT REACTS

UPON CHARACTER. No doubt actions are the expression of the moral

nature, the moral habits, of men. But, on the other hand, those who

persevere in a certain course of conduct are by that very fact molded and

fashioned and even transformed. Thus it is that those who submit to

circumstances and who yield to influences are affected even in their inmost

moral nature by the experience they pass through.

 

·         PASSION AND INTEREST WARP THE MORAL JUDGMENT.

Nations which, like Israel, are guilty of luxury and of idolatry, which

pillage their neighbors’ goods, and wage unlawful war, involving

widespread calamity, thereby blunt their sensibilities to right and wrong.

They habituate themselves to regard all questions in the light of their own

ambition, or their own aggrandizement and enrichment. As a consequence

they are tempted to call evil good, and good evil. Especially are they liable

to term a false judgment upon their own conduct.  (in my opinion this

defines the so-called Progressive movement today.  CY - 2022)

 

·         THUS WRONG DOING HAS A TENDENCY TO PERPETUATE

ITSELF. They who by reason of abandoning themselves to evil courses

have silenced the voice of conscience, lose the moral power to do better.

Because they “know not to do right,” they continue to do wrong. They

reap as they have sown. They advance upon the road of sin by the

momentum derived from past iniquity.

 

11 “Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; An adversary there shall be

even round about the land; and he shall bring down thy strength

from thee, and thy palaces shall be spoiled.” An adversary. The Hebrew

is forcible, the Lord speaking as though He saw the foe present: an enemy

 and around the land.” The adversary meant is Shalmaneser, who attacked

Israel more than once and besieged Samaria; or his successor, Sargon, who

claims to have reduced the city and removed the inhabitants (II Kings 17 and

18:9-12. Thy strength. All wherein thou trusted shall be brought down to the

ground (Obadiah 1:3). Palaces, in which were stored the fruits of injustice and

rapine (v. 10).

 

 

 

                                                Rectitude (vs. 10-11)

 

“For they know not to do right, saith the Lord, who store up violence and

robbery in their palaces,” etc. We derive from this passage three general

remarks.

 

·         THAT THERE IS AN ETERNAL LAW OF “RIGHT” THAT

SHOULD GOVERN MAN IN ALL HIS RELATIONS. Right, as a

sentiment, is one of the deepest, most ineradicable, and operative

sentiments in humanity. All men feel that there is such a thing as right.

What the right is, is a subject on which there has been and is a variety of

opinion. Right implies a standard, and men differ about the standard. Some

say the law of your country is the standard; some say public sentiment is

the standard; some say temporal expediency is the standard. All these are

fearfully mistaken. The Bible teach that there is but one

standard — that is THE WILL OF THE CREATOR!  That will He reveals

in many ways:

 

o       in nature,

o       in history,

o       in conscience,

o       in Christ, THE LIVING WORD,

o       in the written Word

 

Conformity to that will is right.

 

Ø      The law of right should govern man in his relations with God. That law

says — Thank the kindest Being most, love the best Being most,

reverence the greatest Being most. “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God

with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and

with all thy strength:” (Mark 12:30)

 

Ø      The law of right should govern man in his relation to his fellow men.

“Whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you, do ye even so unto

them. (Matthew 7:12)  This law of right is immutable. It admits of no

modification. It is universal. It is binding alike on all moral beings in

the universe. It is benevolent. It seeks the happiness of all. Earth will

be Paradise again when the will of God is done here “as it is in heaven.”

 

·         THAT A PRACTICAL DISREGARD OF THIS LAW LEADS TO

FRAUD AND VIOLENCE. “For they know not to do right, saith the

Lord, who store up violence and robbery in their palaces.” The magnates

of Samaria had no respect for the practice of right, hence they “stored up

violence and robbery in their palaces.” FRAUD  and VIOLENCE are the

two great primary crimes in all social life. By the former men are deceived,

befooled, rifled of their rights, and disappointed of their hopes and

expectations. Never was fraud stronger in England than today — fraud in

literature, commerce, religion, legislation. By the latter, men are disabled,

wounded, crushed, murdered. Can the history of the world furnish more

terrible manifeststions of violence than we have had in the wars of

Christendom in this age? Why this fraud and violence? Why are these

devils let loose to fill the world with lamentation and woe? The answer is in

the text, “Men know not to do right” That is, they do not practice the right.

 

·         THAT FRAUD AND VIOLENCE MUST ULTIMATELY MEET

WITH CONDIGN PUNISHMENT. “Therefore thus saith the Lord God;

An adversary there shall be even round about the land; and he shall bring

down thy strength from thee, and thy palaces shall be spoiled.” How was

this realized? “Against him came up Shalmaneser King of Assyria; and

Hoshea became his servant, and gave him presents .... In the ninth year of

Hoshea the King of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away into

Assyria, and placed them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and

in the cities of the Medes” (II Kings 3-6; 18:9-11). The cheats and.

murderers of mankind will, as sure as there is justice in the world, meet

with a terrible doom.  “Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your

miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your

garments are moth eaten. Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of

them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire.

Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days. Behold, the hire of the

laborers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by

fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the

ears of the Lord of sabaoth. Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and

been wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter. Ye

have condemned and killed the just; and he doth not resist you” (James

5:1-6). “Punishment is the recoil of crime; and the strength of the back

stroke is in proportion to the original blow.”

 

12 “Thus saith the LORD; As the shepherd taketh out of the mouth of

the lion two legs, or a piece of an ear; so shall the children of Israel be

taken out that dwell in Samaria in the corner of a bed, and in Damascus

in a couch.” The prophet shows that the chastisement is inevitable, and that

only the smallest remnant, the most worthless among the inhabitants, and

they with much difficulty, can escape. The illustration from a common

incident in a shepherd’s life is very natural in Amos. Taketh; better,

rescueth. So below, shall be taken out; shall be rescued. The usual

explanation is that a shepherd attacks the lion which has seized one of his

sheep (compare I Samuel 17:34-37), and rescues from it the most

worthless parts — “a couple of shank bones or a bit, or tip, of an ear.” But

as an attack on a lion would be an abnormal act of courage on the part of a

shepherd, and the comparison is with things likely and usual, it is probable

that the meaning is that the shepherd finds only these poor remnants after

the lion has left his prey. So such a poor remnant shall be rescued from the

ten tribes of Israel. That dwell in Samaria in the corner of a bed; that sit

at ease, lounging in the coziest corner of the divan, an image of indolent

ease and careless security IN THE FACE OF JUDGMENT.   And in

Damascus in a couch; Septuagint, καὶ ἐν Δαμασκῷ:- kai en Damasko

Damascus - Vulgate, et in Damasci grabato. The Syriac and Jewish Versions

agree in considering the word Damascus to be a proper name. The other

modern rendering takes it to mean the material which we call “damask,” or

something similar. Hence our Revised Version gives, “on the silken cushions

of a bed;” and others, “on the damask of a couch.” Dr. Pusey retains the old

rendering, on the grounds that there is no evidence to prove that the manufactures

for which Damascus was celebrated in after time existed at this period, its exports

being then wine and white wool (Ezekiel 27:18), and that the Arabic

word dimakso (which critics have cited as connected with the term

“damask”) has nothing to do with Damascus, and meant raw, not

manufactured, “silk.” He translates, “in Damascus, a couch,” and explains

this to mean that Damascus, which Jeroboam II had won for Israel (II  Kings

14:28), “was a canopied couch to them, in which they stayed themselves.

This agrees with the ancient Jewish interpretation, which explains the clause

to mean that the Israelites would some day depend for help on the Syrians

represented by Damascus A third exposition, favored by the Latin Vulgate,

makes the words to mean, “on a couch of Damascus;” i.e. a Syrian couch

of a costly and luxurious nature. This comes to the same as the modern rendering

given, above and seems to be the easiest explanation of the expression. The

difficulty depends chiefly on the punctuation of the word Ëçmd; or there may

be some corruption in the text. What the Septuagint meant by their rendering is

problematical, Κατέναντι τῆς φυλῆς καὶ ἐν Δαμασκῷ- Katenanti

tae phulaes kai en Damasko -  The children of Israel who dwell in

Samaria in the presence of the tribe and in Damascus.

 

 

            The Prophet gets His Heavy Commission (vs. 9-12)

 

It is Jehovah that speaks. He addresses the prophets (Keil), or the heathen

(Lange), or the heathen through the prophets. The passage is a summons

to the nations to appear as witnesses of Israel’s flagrant sin, and her

dreadful punishment. There are many articles in her predicted woe. Not

least of these is condemnation by the heathen, who for less heinous sins

were to be themselves destroyed. When a professed follower of God

apostatizes in such a fashion that even God’s enemies cry shame, and

endures a corresponding punishment in their sight, the cup of his iniquity

and of his retribution are both full.

 

·         THE CRIME CHARGED. There are many counts in this grave

indictment.

 

Ø      The confusion of sordid money seeking. “See the great confusions in the

midst thereof.” The restlessness of greed, the fever of speculation, the

wrangling of barter, and the tumult of audacious extortion are all included

here. The mingling of excitement, disorder, and noise in a struggle for

money, suggest a scene in which little is left to fancy with one who has

been “on ‘Change.”

 

Ø      The oppression of power without principle. And the oppressed in the

heart thereof.” From fraud to oppression is but a single step, and a short

one. It is simply a question of power. The swindler would steal if he could.

The thief would rob with violence if he dare. When dishonesty, moreover,

prevails in private life, a system of public plunder is only a question of

opportunity.

 

Ø      Wrong doing till the way to do right had been forgotten. “They know

not to do right.” “In the nature of things every sin against light draws blood

on the spiritual retina” (Joseph Cook). Men are both hardened and blinded

by a course of sin. Evil actions repeated become habits, and evil habits

indulged in work themselves into the very texture of the soul. The wrong

of ill-doing soon ceases to be felt, which naturally leads to its ceasing to be

seen (Jeremiah 4:22; compare Romans 16:19). When we can sin without

conscience, we are very near to sinning without consciousness, The way to

preserve a good conscience, a conscience that knows evil and condemns it,

is to respect its least dictate. “Sow an act, and you reap a habit; sow a

habit, and you reap a character; sow a character, and you reap a destiny.”

 

The chains of habit are too light to be felt

until they are too strong to be broken.  (Samuel Johnson)

 

Ø      Putting by plunder in store. Who store up violence and devastation in

their palaces.” Plunder has not even the poor excuse of need. It is practiced

gratuitously, as without limit. The poor were fleeced and impoverished,

that the sordid rich might heap up enormous and superfluous stores. And

by the terms there was stored up not only the spoil of violence, but

violence itself, Pari passu (equal footing), with the accumulation of

ill-gotten gain was the heaping up of the sin of their unrighteous getting,

whilst in heaping up sin they were necessarily treasuring up wrath

(Romans 2:5).

 

·         THE WITNESSES SUMMONED. “Assemble upon the mountains,” -

A reference to the topography of Samaria brings out the graphic fitness

of the language here. The city was built on a hill,  surrounded and overlooked

by mountains higher than itself, and from the tops of which the nations could

look down into the very streets, and observe the daily doings of the inhabitants. 

(What is your concept of God?  Certainly, if man has the ability, today, to

cover as news anything in the world and it be shared simultaneously, then

you and I should be able to conceive of  God judging and explaining the

lives and actions of every person and every generation, AT ONCE, to where

every eye and every heart could see and understand HIS JUDGMENT!  

Perhaps we can understand in the backdrop of a scene like the Super Bowl,

magnified a million times - CY – 2013)  Notice:

:

Ø      Abandonment in sin is a sight for a mans worst enemy to see. The

certainty, severity, and nearness of avenging judgment makes sin, from

even the low utilitarian standpoint, the greatest possible evil. The enemy,

who rejoices in our ill, can find no such occasion of malignant joy as our

giving ourselves up to sin. After the fact that it offends God, the strongest

argument against sin is the fact, the obverse of the other, that it pleases

the devil and wicked men.

 

Ø      When men lose the sense of sin, God appeals to THEIR SENSE OF

SHAME.   It is strange that the sense of shame should survive the sense

of sin, but so it is. We fear men more than God. We are not ashamed to

do what we would be very much ashamed to acknowledge. The poet’s

sarcasm is just, that in the matter of sin our care is “not to leave undone,

but keep unknown.” THE BITTERNESS OF PUNISHMENT IS

GREATLY AGGRAVATED BY ITS BEING INFLICTED IN THE

PRESENCE OF AN EXULTING ENEMY.  (The modern example is the

media’s reaction to the fall of the likes of Jim Bakker and Jimmy

Swaggartbut in that day there will be no glossing over of the short-

comings of the Ted Kennedy’s, Hugh Hefner’s, Larry Flint’s and the

million wannabes of the world – IT WILL BE ON AN OPEN STAGE,

A GIGANTIC OPEN CONCERT, ETC! – CY – 2013) Philistia and

Egypt were, moreover, the enemies whose cognizance of their way and

end Israel would most feel and fear (II Samuel 1:20). To this last shred

of feeling on which a motive could lay hold Jehovah here appeals. They

would be a gazing stock (Like Israel of old, the United States will be

an interesting but tragic CASE STUDY to not only their bitterest

enemies BUT TO ALL WHO HAVE EVER LIVED AND BREATHED

THE BREATH OF LIFE!  This will be along the lines of Jesus’

statement in Matthew 12:41-42 – “The men of Nineveh shall rise in

judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they

 repented at the preaching of Jonah…… The queen of the south shall

rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: etc –

CY – 2013)  Like the woman set in the midst amid one encircling sea

of accusing, insulting faces, with none to pity, none to intercede, none to

show mercy to them who had showed no mercy. Faint image of the shame

of that day when not men’s deeds only, but the secrets of all hearts, shall

be revealed, (Luke 12:2-5) and they shall begin ‘to say to the mountains,

 Fall on us, and to the hills, Cover us – HIDE US FROM THE FACE

OF HIM THAT SITTETH ON THE THRONE, AND FROM THE

WRATH OF THE LAMB!  FOR THE GREAT DAY OF HIS WRATH

IS COME; AND WHO SHALL BE ABLE TO STAND! (Revelation

6:16-17)

 

(The legacy of the effects of Liberalism, Progressivism and the tenets of the ACLU

in practice is becoming ingrained in American culture [today it is called THE

DEEP STATE] until, like Israel, there will be NO REMEDY!  See II Chronicles

36:16 - CY - 2013)   The art of wrong doing  advances with rapid pace as it is

handed on. The son of the “smart” trader is a swindler, the son of the swindler is the

burglar, the son of the burglar is the robber assassin. The pupil of the religious liberal

is the rationalist, and the pupil of the rationalist is the atheist. Begin by imitating

wicked men, and you will end by OUTSTRIPPING THEM IN SIN!  Give the devil

a ride and he will end up wanting to drive!

 

 

Ø      The pupil in the art of ill-doing often outdoes the master. It is assumed

that even Egypt and Philistia would be shocked at the sight of the wrong

doing of apostate Israel, and so become witnesses against them. Yet Egypt

had taught them “oppression,” and Philistia had given them many a lesson

in “violence and devastation.” The art of wrong doing advances with rapid

strides as it is handed on. The son of the “smart” trader is a swindler, the

son of the swindler is the burglar, the son of the burglar is the robber

assassin. The pupil of the religious liberal is the rationalist, and the pupil

of the rationalist is the atheist. Begin by imitating wicked men, and you

will end by outstripping them in sin.

 

·         THE SENTENCE PRONOUNCED. This is at once heavy in its

nature and explicit in its details. We see here that:

 

Ø      When Gods judgments come against a man they surround him. (v.11,

“An enemy, and that round about the land.”) The impossibility of

escaping when God attacks is self-evident. Punishment is in such a way

interwoven with sin that they cannot be dissociated. When we sin

against God we sin against the nature of things. Physical, mental, and

social law jump each with moral law, are broken in the breach of it,

and so are each of them a channel to guide to us the full flood of

retribution. “Though hand join in hand, yet shall not the wicked go

unpunished.” (Proverbs 11:21)

 

Ø      When God strikes a sinner he strikes him on the seat of his sin. “And

he shall bring down,” etc. (v. 11); “That dwell in Samaria,” etc. (v. 12).

The strong had oppressed and pillaged the weak, and God’s hand would

fall on their strength. In the palaces the spoil of violence had been

heaped up, and the palaces should be the special prey of the plunderer.

The beds and couches which had ministered to their sinful indulgence

would be carried away to the last stick. It is so always. The punishment

of drunkenness, uncleanness, pride, theft, lying, comes in many ways,

but in every case pre-eminently through the lust or appetite involved.

This is according to natural laws, but is none the less the arrangement

of God. He has put latent in every power a mystic spark, which, if the

power be abused, becomes a retributive fire to burn the breaker of

His Law.

 

Ø      When sin is adequately punished the sinners well being is practically

destroyed. “Delivers out of the mouth of the lion two shin bones and an ear

lappet,” etc. (ver. 12). These are paltry leavings, not worth the rescue. And

such, and so insignificant, would be the surviving good of Israel, when

God’s controversy was settled. Where the scythe of God’s judgment has

passed there is little left for the gleaner. The detected thief, the broken

down sensualist through the effects of AIDS (Proverbs 5:11-13; Romans 1:27),

the besotted drunkard, the drug addict,  what is each but A HUMAN

WRECK!   The kernel of life is wasted, and only a husk remains. No wallflower

of good can ever grow to cover these wrecks of time.

 

Israel had done wrong until the way to do right had been forgotten. “They know

not to do right.”  Every sin against light draws blood on the spiritual retina.

Men are both HARDENED and BLINDED by a course of sin. Evil actions

repeated become habits, and evil habits indulged in work themselves into THE

VERY TEXTURE OF THE SOUL!   The wrong of ill-doing soon ceases to be felt

(the chains of habit are too light to be felt until they are too strong to be broken),

which naturally leads to its ceasing to be seen (Jeremiah 4:22; compare Romans 16:19).

When we can sin without conscience, we are very near to SINNING WITHOUT

CONSCIOUSNESS!   The way to preserve a good conscience, a conscience that

knows evil and condemns it, is to respect its least dictate.

 

“Sow an act, and you reap a habit;

 sow a habit, and you reap a character;

 sow a character, and you reap a destiny.”

                                    (Ralph Waldo Emerson)

 

Nations which, like Israel, are guilty of luxury and of idolatry, which

pillage their neighbors’ goods, and wage unlawful war, involving

widespread calamity, thereby blunt their sensibilities to right and wrong.

They habituate themselves to regard all questions in the light of their own

ambition, or their own aggrandizement and enrichment. As a consequence

they are tempted to call evil good, and good evil. Especially are they liable

to term a false judgment upon their own conduct (Isaiah 5:20-21).  Paul

speaks of a condition where the conscience is “seared with a hot iron” –

(I Timothy 4:2)

 

  • Wrong has a tendency to perpetuate itself.  They who by reason of

abandoning themselves to evil courses have silenced the voice of

conscience and in the process, lose the moral power to do better.

Because they “know not to do right,” THEY CONTINUE TO

DO WRONG!  They reap as they have sown. They advance upon

the road of sin by the MOMENTUM DERIVED FROM PAST

INIQUITY!

 

 

 

 

13 “Hear ye, and testify in the house of Jacob, saith the Lord GOD, the

God of hosts,”  Hear ye; Septuagint, Ἱερεῖς ἀκούσατε -  Hereis akousate

Hear, O ye priests.  The address is to the heathen, already summoned (v. 9) to

witness the sins of Israel, and now called to witness her punishment,

In the house; better, against the house of Jacob, the tribes of Israel (v. 1).

God of hosts. God of the powers of heaven and earth, and therefore able to

execute His threats. Septuagint, Παντοκράτωρ ho Pantokrator

 “the Almighty.”

 

14 “That in the day that I shall visit the transgressions of Israel upon

him I will also visit the altars of Bethel: and the horns of the altar

shall be cut off, and fall to the ground.”  That in the day, etc. This verse

is rightly joined to the preceding, as it particularizes the threats which the heathen

are summoned to testify. Visit upon; equivalent to “punish” (Zephaniah 1:8).

Altars of Bethel. We read of one altar being set up by Jeroboam I (I Kings

12:29, 33), but doubtless others had been added in the course of time. The

denunciation of Ibid. ch.13:2-3 is here repeated. The horns of the

altar. These were certain projections at the four angles of the altar,

perhaps in the form of an ox’s horn, on which the blood of the sin offering

was smeared, and which therefore were considered the holiest part of the

altar (see Exodus 27:2; 29:12; Leviticus 16:18). The instruments of

idolatry or impure worship should share the destruction of the idolaters.

 

Sin is punished by being returned on the sinner’s head.   “When I visit Israel’s

transgression upon him.” The sin not only leads to the punishment, but as it

were re-embodies itself in it.

 

  • The memory of sin haunts him. When sin is done it is not done with. Like

the dead bird around the Ancient Mariner’s neck, an avenging Providence

ties the memory of it to our soul. Like the crime of Eugene Aram, it

becomes an evil haunting memory, to dog our steps forever.

 

“And still no peace for the restless clay

    Will wave or mould allow;

The horrid thing pursues my soul —

    It stands before me now.”

(Hood.)

 

  • The permanent evil consequences of it keep it before the memory. The

sins of youth are the sowing of which the sufferings of manhood and age

are the harvest — a harvest too constantly and painfully reaped to allow

the harvester to forget. The sins of one man are the fruitful source of the

sins and sorrows of many, and find in each of these a mentor who makes it

impossible to forget. In addition to the sinner and the sinned against,

wrong doing injures those whose well being depends on either. It is thus a

poison tree that forks and branches in the bearing of its deadly fruit. While

the evil consequences of his wrong doing are around him, and propagating

themselves in ever-widening circles, the sinner apart from conscience

cannot get his iniquities out of sight.  (i.e. – Darwinism, Freudism,

Marxism, etc. – CY – 2013)

 

  • Jeroboam did not create a religion, but evilly adapted it.  Man can form

no idea of spiritual things apart from Divine revelation (I Corinthians 2:9).

At the same time, God’s revelation of spiritual things is too pure for his

taste. The result is that he compromises the matter by adopting ready-made

ordinances, and loading them with his own corrupt spirit and meaning.

 

  • One idol breeds many.  “The altars of Bethel.” There was but

one sacrificial altar in connection with the worship of Jehovah, but when

many gods were invented, many altars were provided to correspond to

them. This multiplication of idols is accounted for by the fact that

evil naturally spreads. One sin leads to more. Covetousness leads to

theft, drunkenness to uncleanness, all three often to murder, and almost

every sin to DECEIT and LYING.  No man can set up one sinful idol

and say he will have no more. It will bring others with it whether he will

or no. It is the first swallow of the summer of evil doing, and heralds a

coming flock.

 

  • The first thing judgment does against the idolater is to deprive him of

His gods.  “The horns of the altar shall be cut off,” etc. This would put an

effectual stop to the idol worship.

 

Ø      Idolatry is at the root of all other sin. It is the complement of

atheism, which is radically the heart departing from God. It is a

sublimated SELF-WORSHIP  making an idol of our own mental

creation. A god dethroned, and a self enthroned, is a state of things

which “contains the promise and potency” OF ALL EVIL!   To

strike at Israel’s idolatry was to lay the axe to the root of the

national evil. The idols abolished, and God restored to the

national heart, Israel’s life would be again a CONCECRATED

ONE!

 

15 “And I will smite the winter house with the summer house; and the

houses of ivory shall perish, and the great houses shall have an

end, saith the LORD.”  The winter house. The luxurious habits of kings and

princes had led them to have different houses for the various seasons of the year,

facing north or south as the case might be (compare Judges 3:20; Jeremiah 36:22).

Septuagint, τὸν οϊκον τὸν περίπτερον ton oikon ton peripteron -  the

turreted house, which Jerome explains, Domum pinnatam, eo quod

ostiola habeat per fenestras, et quasi pinnas, ad magnitudinem frigoris

depellendam. Houses of ivory; panelled or inlaid with ivory, such as Ahab

had (I Kings 22:39). Solomon’s throne was thus decorated (Ibid. ch.10:18;

compare Psalm 45:8). (For the Assyrian practice of veneering in ivory, see

Rawlinson, ‘Ancient Monarchies,’ 1:463; comp. also Homer, ‘Od.,’ 4:73;

Virgil, ‘AEneid,’ 6:895.) The great houses; better, many houses; Septuagint,

ἕτεροι οϊκοι πολλοί, - heteroi oikoi polloi -  many other houses. Not only

palaces, but many private houses, shall be destroyed (compare Isaiah 5:9,

where the same words are used).

 

 

 

                        The Residue of Israel’s Woe (vs. 13-15)

 

Those who had been called to witness the sin of Israel are now summoned

to hear and report her sentence. In connection with this we see that:

 

·         EVEN HEATHENS CAN TESTIFY AGAINST APOSTATE ISRAEL

IN THE JUDGMENT. To testify is not merely to convey intelligence; it

contains in it the idea of protest, i.e. testifying against.

 

Ø      The heathen had a natural sense of right and wrong. Paul says they

“show the work of the law written in their hearts,” and “are a law

unto themselves.”  (Romans 2:14-15)  A rule of duty is included in

the constitution of their nature. They know right from wrong, arid

are governed by a sense of obligation.  They could, therefore, judge

the conduct of Israel. They could see and testify that it did not come

up to even their own imperfect standard of right.

 

Ø      They had been truer to their standard of right than Israel had. Paul tells

us that the heathen had not been true to their light (Romans 1:21-28),

and that the punishment of that was diminished light. But they had been

truer, on the whole, than Israel had been to hers. Their morality was not

so far below Israel’s as their inferior light would lead us to expect. Hence

the assumption that they would be shocked at Israel’s manifold

corruptions. Moral deterioration is measured, not so much by the absolute

amount and kind of wrong doing as by the extent to which it falls below

the known standard of right. Other things being equal, he is relatively

the best man who most closely follows his light (John 3:19; Romans 2:14).

 

Ø      They would learn something for themselves from this witness-bearing.

Discrimination would see that Israel’s sin was not a result, but the

contradiction, of the national religion; that it was an evil result of

heathen influence, and involving the heathen more or less in its guilt;

that Israel’s God was a God that judgeth righteously, and taketh

vengeance on evil doers; and that judgment, beginning at God’s

chosen people, would not miss His open enemies. The very act of

testifying against Israel, moreover, would involve such an exercise of

the moral sense, in reference to their sin, as could not fail to be beneficial.

 

·         SIN IS PUNISHED BY BEING RETURNED ON THE SINNER’S

HEAD. “When I visit Israel’s transgression upon him.” The sin not only

leads to the punishment, but as it were re-embodies itself in it.

 

Ø      The memory of it haunts him. When sin is done it is not done with.

Like the dead bird around the Ancient Mariner’s neck, an avenging

Providence ties the memory of it to our soul. Like the crime of Eugene

Aram, it becomes an evil haunting memory, to dog our steps forever.

 

“And still no peace for the restless clay

Will wave or mold allow;

The horrid thing pursues my soul —

It stands before me now.”

                                                (Hood.)

 

Ø      The permanent evil consequences of it keep it before the memory. The

sins of youth are the sowing of which the sufferings of manhood and age

are the harvest — a harvest too constantly and painfully reaped to allow

the harvester to forget. The sins of one man are the fruitful source of the

sins and sorrows of many, and find in each of these a mentor who makes

it impossible to forget. In addition to tile sinner and the sinned against,

wrong doing injures those whose well being depends on either. It is

thus a poison tree that forks and branches in the bearing of its deadly

fruit. While the evil consequences of his wrong doing are around him,

and propagating themselves in ever-widening circles, the sinner apart

from conscience cannot get his iniquities out of sight.

 

Ø      Not seldom the punishment is a resurrection of the sin itself. Laban’s

trick on Jacob was a repetition of Jacob’s trick on Isaac (Genesis

29:25; 27:15-27). The deaths of Haman and Jezebel were similarly

adjusted punishments. So with the cutting off the thumbs and great

toes of the archmutilator Adoni-bezek (Judges 1:6-7). In such cases

the sin is palpably returned in retribution on the sinner’s head.

 

·         IDOL WORSHIP IS A SIMULATION OF THE WORSHIP OF

GOD. “The altars of Bethel, and the horns of the altar.” Both in the use of

an altar and in the form of the altar used the idol worship set up by

Jeroboam was a plagiarism from the worship of Jehovah.

 

Ø      Man cannot create in religion, but he can adapt. He can form no idea

of spiritual things apart from Divine revelation (1 Corinthians 2:9). At

the same time, God’s revelation of spiritual things is too pure for

his taste. The result is that he compromises the matter by adopting

ready-made ordinances, and loading them with his own corrupt spirit

and meaning.

 

Ø      Idolatrous worship seems less of an apostasy in proportion as it retains

the forms of true worship. The devil lets man down into idolatry as into

other sin by easy stages. First he parts with the spirit of true worship,

whilst retaining the form. Then he parts with the object of it, corrupting

the form. Then he adopts a new object, and adapts to its worship the

already corrupted form. And so with all sin, which is spiritual idolatry.

Man does not first abandon the forms of godliness, and then the

practice of it. He gives up the substance of it as A MATTER OF

TASTE,  and tries to salve his conscience for this by adhering

to its forms (II Timothy 3:5).

 

Ø      This also makes it more plausible and insidious. The worship set up in

Dan and Bethel by Jeroboam was not idol worship pure and simple. It

was the worship of God by means of idols, and in forms which

mimicked the worship at Jerusalem. Heresy at the outset always

masquerades in the guise of truth. By adopting the sheep’s clothing

the wolf gets easy access  to the fold. It is only after he has entered,

and the danger of eviction is over, that his true character is assumed.

 

·         ONE IDOL BREEDS MANY. “The altars of Bethel.” There was but

one sacrificial altar in connection with the worship of Jehovah, but when

many gods were invented, many altars were provided to correspond to

them. This multiplication of idols is accounted for by the fact that:

 

Ø      Evil naturally spreads. One sin leads to more. Covetousness leads to

theft, drunkenness to uncleanness, all three often to murder, and almost

every sin to deceit and lying. No man can set up one sinful idol and say

he will have no more. It will bring others with it whether he will or no.

It is the first swallow of the summer of evil doing, and heralds a coming flock.

 

Ø      Idolatry must become polytheism in the attempt to meet the spiritual

wants of men. God is an infinite Being, and so can meet our human

necessity all round. But an idol is the creation of a finite mind, and so a

finite thing. It is to meet one need of our nature, the need that was

uppermost in the consciousness of the inventor. But a different need

will be uppermost in another worshipper, and a different idol will be

wanted to meet his case. Accordingly, in the mythology were many

gods, who distributed among them the various functions necessary

to complete the circle of human good. It was, in fact, an attempt,

by multiplying deities indefinitely, to provide a substitute for

THE INFINITE JEHOVAH!

 

A worship that is all error is more logical than one that is half truth.

Everything has its own proper form. You do not find an eagle in the form

of a dove, nor an apple in the form of a plum, nor an evil principle in the

form of a good one. If such a form is artificially put round it, the result

is A PALABLE MISFIT!   Polytheism is the nearest approach to logical

idolatry, and in proportion as it is self-consistent is dangerous, and wins

its way.

 

 

·         THE FIRST THING JUDGMENT DOES AGAINST THE

IDOLATER IS TO DEPRIVE HIM OF HIS GODS. “The horns of the

altar shall be cut off,” etc. This would put an effectual stop to the idol

worship. We thus see that:

 

Ø      God wants His judgments to be recognized. He never punishes men

incognito. When He puts forth His power He wants men to see that it is

His (Exodus 7:5; 1 Kings 20:28; Ezekiel 6:7 - and 61 other places in

Ezekiel - see #223 - this website - CY - 2022), and striking the very

seat of sin inflicts a stroke at once significant and effectual, a revelation

at once of the Divine hand and power.

 

Ø      He wants them to be effective. The moral effect of a judgment depends

very much on our knowing whence it comes. If we recognize it as sent by

God, it is tenfold more impressive. Now, to exercise the maximum of

beneficial influence with the minimum of afflictive visitation is ever

God’s way (Lamentations 3:32-33). He does not strike an aimless or a

needless blow. Each stroke is meant to tell, and the medicine of affliction

is stopped the moment the patient is cured.

 

Ø      Idolatry is at the root of all other sin. It is the complement of atheism,

which is radically the heart departing from God. It is a sublimated

self-worship, making an idol of our own mental creation. A god

dethroned, and a self enthroned, is a state of things which “contains

the promise and potency” of all evil. To strike at Israel’s idolatry was

to lay the axe to the root of the national evil. The idols abolished, and

God restored to the national heart, its life would be again a

consecrated one.

 

·         MAN’S SELF-INDULGENCE, THE DEAREST IDOL HE HAS,

WILL BE TAKEN FROM HIM ALONG WITH THE REST. (v. 15,

And I will smite,” etc.) Luxuries long enjoyed become necessities of life,

and no judgment would be thorough that left them untouched. Self-

indulgence, if it were left, would soon invent a new idolatry for its own

accommodation. It is only by making a clean sweep of the idols already in

possession that God can get His place in the sinner’s heart.

 

 

 

            Retribution upon the Altar and the Palace (vs. 13-15)

 

The language of the prophet in this passage is severe in its import and

graphic in its style. He foresees the approach of the invaders, the

powerlessness of Israel to resist their attack, the completeness with which

their work is destined to be done. In two directions especially the blow of

vengeance is seen to fall:

 

·         IDOLATRY IS PUNISHED BY THE DESTRUCTION OF IDOL

TEMPLES AND ALTARS. Departure from Jehovah was the radical

offence of Israel. Beside the great altar set up at Bethel by Jeroboam,

where the golden calves were worshipped, there seem to have been other

sacred places, which were polluted by idol service and idol sacrifice.

Heathenism was seen to encroach upon the territory consecrated to

Jehovah. Altars were reared to deities, imaginary indeed, but endowed by

popular superstition with characters altogether opposed to the pure and

perfect character of the Eternal who had revealed Himself to the ancestors

of the Hebrew nation. It was most appropriate that retribution should fall

upon the centers and the symbols of a worship so debasing as that which

had been substituted for the service of Jehovah. The powerlessness of the

so called “gods” to protect their sanctuaries and their altars was made

manifest; the defeat of Baal was the triumph of Jehovah.

 

·         PRIDE AND LUXURY ARE PUNISHED BY THE DESTRUCTION

OF THE MANSIONS AND PALACES OF THE GREAT. Whether we

regard these “summer houses” as simply the upper apartments, or as

country villas erected in rural retreats, the prophetic lesson is the same.

Their destruction, and the destruction of the sumptuous residences

decorated with ornaments of ivory, was a retribution upon those who

esteemed the splendor and luxuriousness of their abodes more dear than

the practice of virtue, of benevolence, of piety. No lesson is more

frequently repeated in Scripture than the lesson that the Judge of all the

earth delights to abase the proud, whilst He exalts the lowly. When the

princes of Israel beheld their sumptuous dwellings razed to the ground, and

when they themselves passed into exile, how could they fail to recognize

the hand of a righteous and indignant God?

 

 

 

 

                                    National Judgments (vs. 13-15)

 

Hear ye, and testify in the house of Jacob, saith the Lord God, the God of

hosts,” etc. The same persons are here addressed who in the ninth verse

were summoned from Philistia and Egypt. They were now to testify to the

facts of the case, that it might be seen that the punishment inflicted upon

the inhabitants was richly deserved. The subject of the words is NATIONAL

JUDGMENT which we are here led to regard in three aspects.

 

·         IN RELATION TO THE TRUE PROPHETS. “Hear ye, and testify in

the house of Jacob.” We may perhaps regard the words also as spoken to

the prophets. Hear, ye prophets.

 

Ø      The prophets were to make themselves acquainted with the coming

judgments. They were to be watchmen who were to descry afar THE

COMING DANGER!  All true ministers of religion should by earnest

study acquaint themselves with the terrible punishment that awaits

the guilty world.

 

Ø      The prophets were to announce the coming, judgment. “Hear ye, and

testify.” Their work is to sound the alarm, to blow the trumpet. “So thou,

O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel:

therefore thou shall hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from

me” (Ezekiel 33:7). One of the chief duties of a true minister is to

“warn every man” (Colossians 1:28).

 

·         IN RELATION TO ITS MORAL CAUSE. What was the cause of

these threatened judgments? Here it is. “I shall visit the transgressions of

Israel.” Judgments do not come on men as a matter of necessity; they do

not roll on man like the billows of ocean on the shore, by blind force; nor

do they come because the Governor of the universe is malevolent, and has

pleasure in the sufferings of His creatures. No; He is love. He “desireth not

the death of a sinner.” They come because of sin. The sins of a nation draw

judgment after them as the moon draws after it the billows that beat upon

the shore. Let no nation hope to escape judgments until IT GETS RID

OF SIN! Judgments are but sins ripened into a harvest, subterranean fires

breaking into volcanoes. Eternal love requires for the order and happiness

of the universe that sins and sorrows, transgressions and troubles, should be

inseparably linked together.

 

·         IN RELATION TO ITS TERRIBLE ISSUES.

 

Ø      There is the deprivation of religious institutions. “I will also visit the

altars of Bethel: and the horns of the altar shall be cut off, and fall to

the ground.” Signal vengeance was to be taken on the place whence all

the evils which spread through the ten tribes originated. The ‘horns’

were four projecting points, in the shape of horns, at the corners of

ancient altars. They may be seen in the representations of those dug

up by Belzoni in Egypt. As they were ornamental, the action here

described was designed to express the contempt in which the altar

would be held by the Assyrians.” Corrupt punishment for a nation’s

transgressions would involve the ruin of religious institutions.

 

Ø      There is a deprivation of all their conveniences and luxuries. “And

I will smite the winter house with the summer house; and the houses

of ivory shall perish, and the great houses shall have an end, saith

the Lord.Eastern monarchs and princes, we are told, have summer

as well as winter houses. The “ivory houses” do not mean houses

composed of that material, but richly ornamented dwellings. These

were to be destroyed. “The pomp or pleasantness of men’s houses,”

says Matthew Henry, “will be so far from fortifying them against

God’s judgments, that it will make them the more grievous and

vexatious, as their extravagance about them will be put

to the score of their sins and follies.”

 

 

 

"Excerpted text Copyright AGES Library, LLC. All rights reserved.

Materials are reproduced by permission."

 

This material can be found at:

http://www.adultbibleclass.com

 

If this exposition is helpful, please share with others.