Ezekiel 48

 

 

The closing chapter of the prophet’s temple-vision treats more particularly

of the distribution of the land among the several tribes (vs. 1-29), and

concludes with a statement concerning the gates, dimensions, and name of

the city (vs. 30-35

 

vs. 1-7 - The portions north of the terumah. These should be seven,

lie in parallel strips from the Mediterranean to the east border, and be

allocated to the tribes of Dan, Asher, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim,

Reuben, and. Judah. The divergences between this and the earlier division

under Joshua (14-19.) are apparent:

 

  • In that Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh received portions

      on the east of Jordan; in this no tribe obtains a lot outside of the boundary

      of the Holy Land.

 

  • In that the allocation commenced in the south with Judah; in this it

      begins in the north with Dan.

 

  • In that the most northern portions, those of Asher and Naphtali, started

      from a point a little above Tyre; in this the most northern portion, that of

      Dan, proceeds from the entering in or the south border of Hamath, some

      fifty or sixty miles north of Damascus.

 

  • In that the portions were scarcely ever parallel; in this they always are.

 

  • In that the portions of Judah and Reuben lay south, and that of Dan

      west of Jerusalem; in this all three are situated north of the city.

 

"Excerpted text Copyright AGES Library, LLC. All rights reserved.

Materials are reproduced by permission."

 

 

This Section deals with the Boundaries of the Land and the Location of

the Tribes.

 

According to Halley’s Bible Handbook the land was not quite as large as

the domain of David.  Roughly, it was the south half of the eastern shore

of the Mediterranean Sea, about 400 miles North and South averaging

about 100 miles East and West.  The tribes were not in their original

arrangement, but as here indicated:

 

 

 

                                                            Dan

                                                            Asher

                                                            Naphtali

                                                            Manasseh

                                                            Ephraim

                                                            Reuben

                                                            Judah

 

                                                            The Temple

 

                                                Prince                          Prince

 

                                                            City

 

                                                            Benjamin

                                                            Simeon

                                                            Issachar

                                                            Zebulon

                                                            Gad

 

 

The city is 7 ˝ miles square, patterned in part, of the New Jerusalem in

Revelation 21 – The Home of God  - v. 35 – “the name of the city from

that day shall be, THE LORD IS THERE!”

 

vs. 8-22 - The terumah, or priests’ portion (vs. 8-12), with the

portions for the Levites (vs. 13, 14), for the city (vs. 15-20), and for

the prince (vs. 21, 22).

 

v. 8 -  The terumah, already referred to (Ezekiel 45:1-5), is here more minutely

described:

 

  • In situation, it should be “by the border of Judah - contiguous to

      Judah’s territory on the south. Hence it should embrace all the above

      specified portions.

 

  • In breadth, from north to south, it should be “twenty-five thousand”

      reeds, this being undoubtedly the word to be supplied.

 

  • In length, it should be as “one of the other parts”, extending from the

      east to the west side of the land.

 

  • In relation to the sanctuary, this should be “in the midst of it”, not

      necessarily in the exact geographical center of the whole terumah in the

      larger sense, but generally in a central position.

 

 

vs. 30-35 - The closing paragraph is devoted to a statement of the

            gates, dimensions, and name of the city.

 

vs. 31-34 – “The gates of the city” - These should be twelve in number,

three on each side, and named after the twelve tribes (comp.Revelation

21:12). The gates leading northward should be those of Reuben, Judah,

and Levi, all children of Leah (Genesis 29:32, 35), as Keil observes,

the firstborn in age, the firstborn by virtue of the patriarchal blessing, and

the one chosen by Jehovah for His own service in the place of the

firstborn.” The same three occupy the first three places and in the same

order in the blessing of Moses (Deuteronomy 33:6-8). Towards the

east should lead the gates of Joseph, Benjamin, and Dan, the first and

second sons of Rachel, and the third a son of Rachel’s handmaid

(Genesis 30:6, 24; 35:18). In the blessing of Moses Benjamin precedes

Joseph (Deuteronomy 33:12, 13). The south gates receive the names of

Simeon, Issachar, and Zebulun, again all sons of Leah. The west gates are

those of Gad, Asher, and Naphtali, that is, two sons of Leah’s handmaid

and one of Rachel’s. It is observable that in the naming of the gates Levi

resumes his place among the tribes, which necessitates the substitution of

Joseph the original tribe-father instead of Ephraim anti Manasseh his two

sons.

 

Vers. 31-34. The gates of the city. These should be twelve in number,

three on each side, and named after the twelve tribes (comp. Revelation

21:12). The gates leading northward should be those of Reuben, Judah,

and Levi, all children of Leah (Genesis 29:32, 35), as Keil observes,

the firstborn in age, the firstborn by virtue of the patriarchal blessing, and

the one chosen by Jehovah for his own service in the place of the

firstborn.” The same three occupy the first three places and in the same

order in the blessing of Moses (Deuteronomy 33:6-8). Towards the

east should lead the gates of Joseph, Benjamin, and Dan, the first and

second sons of Rachel, and the third a son of Rachel’s handmaid

(Genesis 30:6, 24; 35:18). In the blessing of Moses Benjamin precedes

Joseph (Deuteronomy 33:12, 13). The south gates receive the names of

Simeon, Issachar, and Zebulun, again all sons of Leah. The west gates are

those of Gad, Asher, and Naphtali, that is, two sons of Leah’s handmaid

and one of Rachel’s. It is observable that in the naming of the gates Levi

resumes his place among the tribes, which necessitates the substitution of

Joseph the original tribe-father instead of Ephraim anti Manasseh his two

sons. (On the phrase, one gate of Judah, literally, the gate of Judah one,

see on v. 1.)

 

"Excerpted text Copyright AGES Library, LLC. All rights reserved.

Materials are reproduced by permission."

 

v. 35 – “The name of the city …..the Lord is there!”

                                                ADDITIONAL NOTES

 

Ver. 15 - A profane place.”

 

We are not to suppose that this place was devoted, to evil uses. It was

simply distinguished from the holy place of the temple. There were degrees

of holiness — all the land holy when compared with heathen countries;

Jerusalem especially the holy city; the temple the holy site in Jerusalem; and

the holy place and the holy of holies the most sacred center of the whole

circle of sanctity. By comparison with the temple area the rest of the city of

Jerusalem was called “profane”

 

I. GOD PROVIDES FOR THE EVERYDAY LIFE OF HIS PEOPLE.

The so-called “profane place” was carefully mapped out, and ample

provision was made for the life of the people in it. The laity was not

ignored when the priesthood was provided for. It was never expected that

the people would spend all their days in the temple, nor that they would

need no comfort for their life in the world. God is not now only concerned

with our attending to religious services at church. The greater part of life

must be occupied with secular pursuits. These pursuits can be followed

according to the call of God, and in occupying ourselves with them we may

well expect that He will give the necessary supplies, guiding our energies,

and ultimately blessing our toil if it is in accordance with His mind and will.

 

II. IT IS POSSIBLE TO LIVE A HOLY LIFE AMIDST THINGS

CALLED PROFANE. The priests might be guilty of spiritual profanity

while busily engaged in temple service; the laity might be truly occupied

with a holy ministry, though on ground that was named profane. It is not

necessary to be consecrated to the priesthood nor to enter a monastery in

order to live “the religious life.” The work of the busy world must be

carried on, and it would be simply disastrous if all who were inspired with

pure and lofty aims were to withdraw from its many necessary occupations.

Not only would the service of life be neglected for want of men and

women to employ themselves in it, but what work was accomplished by

others would be degraded in character. This would just amount to handing

the world and all its concerns over to the powers of wickedness. Christians

are called upon to take the exactly opposite course, and so to be “the salt

of the earth” (Matthew 5:13).

 

III. ADVERSE EXTERNAL CIRCUMSTANCES DO NOT PREVENT

SPIRITUALITY OF LIFE. The secularity of a man’s occupations does not

prevent him from being a Christian of the very highest type. The supposed

profaneness of his circumstances cannot be accepted as an excuse for

godless, sinful living. Nothing would be really profane if the heart were

true and spiritual; for “to the pure all things are pure.” It is sometimes

supposed that it would be more easy for a man to live a religious life if he

were a minister of religion. But then the temptation of professionalism

would come in, and the business spirit endanger the sacredness of the most

spiritual things, whereas when religion is wholly sought after for its

spiritual use it is less in danger of sinking into a mere form. But the whole

question turns on the spirituality of the character and conduct — rather

than on the form of the occupations of daily duty.

 

v. 35 - A Glorious Name.

 

The restored city of Jerusalem is to receive a new name, “The Lord is

there.” The announcement of this name makes a splendid conclusion to the

Book of Ezekiel. The numerous and varied utterances of the prophet have

carried us through scenes of shame and sorrow, and even of blood and

terror; but above all has shone the vision of God and His grand providence,

and the end of all is seen in the new city and temple of a renewed people.

 

I. THE NAME DESCRIBES A WONDERFUL FACT. Sin drives away

the blessed consciousness of the Divine presence, though God is never

really absent from any part of His dominions. But when God’s people are

reconciled to Him he draws near to them in inward communion.

 

  • A real presence. This is not the name of a truth unrealized. God is now

      present with His people. He does not govern His city by deputy;

      He Himself dwells there.

 

  • A permanent presence. “The Lord is there.” This describes what is

      continuous. God is ever with His people.

 

  • A wide presence. He fills the city; all the citizens may enjoy His

      fellowship.

 

II. THE NAME DENOTES A HAPPY CONDITION. God is present for

high and glorious purposes.

 

  • To protect. God is the Commander of the garrison, and He has

      innumerable heavenly armies whom He can summon to the relief of His

      hard-pressed people as occasion may require. If He is in our midst, we

      shall never be moved (Psalm 46:5).

 

  • To govern. God is the Sovereign. If He comes, it must be to rule over us.

      The order and life of the Church depend on the Divine Spirit that dwells in

      the midst of her. But if God is thus present, He must be obeyed.

      Disobedience is sedition.

 

  • To bless. The very presence of God is sunshine to the soul. His

      communion with His people brings life and blessedness.

III. THE NAME COMMEMORATES A GREAT EVENT. “From that

day.” This phrase indicates a definite period. There were ages when it

could not be used; there is a particular time after which it can be used, viz.

the time of the restoration of Israel, and the rebuilding of the once ruined

and desolate city. The glorious name takes its rise from this glorious event.

 

  • After repentance. Sin caused God to withdraw from the city. He

      returns to meet His penitent people, He dwells in the contrite spirit.

 

  • Through redemption. God calls His people back to their land after He

      has redeemed them from the power of their enemies. Christ’s redemption

      opens the path for a return to God. He -  our great Redeemer — is the

      Way to God.

 

  • In restoration. The people come back to their home and rebuild their

      city; then God manifests Himself in the midst of them. God dwells in His

      Church from the time of Christ’s great restoring work; He dwells in

      each soul as soon as it is restored to Him. The thought of His presence

      commemorates our redemption.

 

IV. THE NAME PROCLAIMS AN IMPORTANT TRUTH. Not only is

it stated that God will be with His people, but this truth is to be constantly

set forth by standing in the very name of the city.

 

  • As a grateful acknowledgment. If God is with us, we ought not to be

      ashamed of so wonderful a fact, nor should we ungratefully ignore it. Let

      this be in the forefront of our banner, let it be the inspiration of our song!

 

  • As a necessary reminder. There is a danger lest God’s people should

      forget His presence in doubt and distrust, or in worldliness and self-       

      sufficiency.

 

  • As an inviting gospel. Dwellers in other parts would learn the new, high

      name of the holy city, and so be led to seek the privileges of citizenship.

      A confession of Christian truth and a description of the blessings of the

      faith help to draw others to Christ and His grace.

 

 

"Excerpted text Copyright AGES Library, LLC. All rights reserved.

Materials are reproduced by permission."